Just a couple things. JBraswell is a real fighter for sure. But others of us on here have trained with real fighters for full on MMA and have gone so far as to walk out to the UFC cage and Pride ring with them. Not that the walking out means anything but I am saying I’ve seen every bit of training and trained with them, seen what it’s like back stage warming up and waiting, weighing in and all the stuff a lot of people dont’ realize goes on. Not everyone here is ignorant. The sport has some new ignorant blood because of a rise in UFC popularity. But there are some legitamate guys here. I know there are a lot of great trainers not on t-mag and a lot of guys here worship the T-Nation crew as gospel, but Chad’s article on mma wasn’t bad. I didn’t agree with all of it but I agreed with a good bit, especially for guys who are not pros. Pros don’t come here for advice much. Adam Singer posts here once in a while. When he disagrees with some article here, he doesnt’ go off on it, he just chooses not to use the info.
I do agree boxing has significant ‘street’ carryover. It has excellent carryover in my experience. I disagree that 1 yr boxing beats 1 yr bjj. It’s too general a statement. In addition, boxing, or just punching is something that is much more natural to people. If someone is unfamiliar with bjj they will usually have a hard time dealing with it.
But there are too many variables to say anyway. Are the bjj and boxing coaches are equally experts, how is the training arranged, and sparring partners? All that stuff weighs in on development. It takes many years to get good at using BJJ on other bjj guys, top notch grapplers from other systems and boxer/strikers with some takedown defense training, that’s true. But out of the gate, against just a brawler, bjj is useful after 6 months to a year if taught right. Many other systems are not effective against a brawler who comes on crazy. Even if you box you can get caught by such a guy if you’ve done it for just a year and he is a bit bigger/faster naturally. Also, Royce Gracie is not BJJ. He is one BJJ guy. BJJ has many practitioners, the top team, other Gracie camps like Renzo or Gracie Barra, Alliance, all the american camps such as SBG, Bravo and Laimon. Even different guys from the same camp will have a lot of diversity in their styles. BJJ is not just about pulling gaurd. It is about the clinch, takedown and the mount. George St. Pierre was a purple belt until very recently. Many tough MMA guys are purple belts (or less than Brown) Diaz and Shields fought before they had brown belts. And many others. Rory did well before he got the brown belt. There are pretty good dues with less than a brown belt. Good academies don’t just hand them out.
[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
Sifu wrote:
I don’t want to denegrate boxing but lets regain our perspective here. Who in the real world walks around with their hands taped and with boxing gloves on?
LMAO. I boxed inside a ring, and I fought in many street fights. Boxing has a significnat carryover to street fighting. If you’re arguing otherwise, then you’re just silly (or a poser who has never been in an actual fight).
Unless a grappler is REALLY good, he will be beaten by most boxers. Why? Because most guys can’t take a hard shot to the face. Unless you’re super good at closing the distance, a boxer will hit you very hard before the fight goes to the ground.
Most guys think if they take a few BJJ classes, they’ll be like Royce Gracie. But it takes MANY years for someone studying BJJ to effectively fight off a boxer.
Notice that the “Gracies in Action” series has guys who have been studying BJJ for DECADES taking on the boxers. If you’re Royler or Royce Gracie, then you’ll have no trouble with even a great boxer.
I would love to do the following: Hold a NHB contest with people who have been studying BJJ for one year, and people who have been boxing for a year. I am confident the boxers would win 90% of the fights.
OF course, the best at BJJ will beat the best boxers. This is not controversial. But if you’re less than a brown belt in BJJ, the odds of winning against a good boxer are not so favorable.[/quote]