[quote]Uncle Gabby wrote:
[quote]Dt546 wrote:
[quote]Houston07 wrote:
[quote]Uncle Gabby wrote:
I don’t buy the addiction is genetics bullshit at all. Perhaps with food etc, because we all have to eat to some extent, and healthy food is more expensive and less convenient and some people get caught in a cycle of overeating and depression. I was a fat kid, I know what that was like.
But crack and Crystal Meth? Come the fuck on. I’m sure I would be addicted to crystal meth if I had ever been dumb enough to try it.
Crack and Crystal Meth are bad, Mmmmkay. STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM THEM AND PEOPLE WHO USE THEM. Few things in life are simpler than that.[/quote]
Agree completely. I do think there a few exceptions, such as alcohol, where genetics MIGHT play a bigger role and this isn’t a hard drug and isn’t as avoidable, so fair enough.
But the best prevention for addiction is to never try it once obviously, which double applys to all the stupid shit that people clearly know is fucking stupid when they first embark upon it. [/quote]
Oh, so where did you do your genetics studies at???
[/quote]
Is that directed at me? If so, Where did you do yours?
Who forced you to smoke crack?
How many people do you know who smoke crack aren’t addicted because of their super awesome genetics?
I’d like to meet someone who’s genetics are so fucking awesome they can smoke crystal meth and not have their life totally wrecked by it.[/quote]
Plenty of people due drugs and do not become dependent, either physically or psychologically.
“According to the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Science, 32 percent of people who try tobacco become dependent, as do 23 percent of those who try heroin, 17 percent who try cocaine, 15 percent who try alcohol and 9 percent who try marijuana.”
I am simply stating that my experience with addiction (personal and profesional) is that it is not a black and white issue. If telling people “Drugs are bad mmk,” kept them off drugs, than our prison systems would be a lot less crowded.