[quote]bullpup wrote:
stiggg wrote:
florin wrote:
stig wales. wrote:
You are needlessly trying to make me look stupid mate.
No. I merely pointed out an error. Even intelligent people make errors.
You said that lower-octane fuel is weaker (i.e. produces less energy), which I said is a common error.
It is not weaker, it produces the same amount of energy like high-octane. It merely explodes easier than high octane when mixed with air.
http://www.repairfaq.org/filipg/AUTO/F_Gasoline6.html#GASOLINE_014
Quote:
If you are already using the proper octane fuel, you will not obtain more power from higher octane fuels. The engine will be already operating at optimum settings, and a higher octane should have no effect on the management system. Your driveability and fuel economy will remain the same. The higher octane fuel costs more, so you are just throwing money away.
So when did I say we should be putting higher ocatane pertrol in out cars ‘just because’ ? I said Euro cars are designed to run on at least 95, get over yourself. You saying that I am saying 87 fuel gives less power than 95 never happened, if it does or it doesn’t. I realise petrol is a sensitive issue for Americans, just get over yourself.
Most European cars are manufactured with a higher cylinder compression ratio. With the higher compression ratio a standard octane gas here in the States, 87 octane, would cause the cylinders to ignite prematurely and have an adverse effect on engine reliability and performance.
Any engine runnning a high compression ratio benefits from higher octane gasoline, if not you have to retard the timing to compensate for the lower octane gasolines fatser burn rate.
You can quote car and driver all you like but, nothing simplifies it better than first hand experience.
I have built racing engine that had a 12.1 compression ratio that ran like shit on regular 87 and 93 octane gas. the only time they would run correctly and not misfire was when I would either cut the 93 octane fuel with 110 octane Sunoco, or retard the timing.
Now, on my standard daily driver it wouldn’t be cost effective for me to run the higher octane gasoline, due to the fact the original equipment manufatures specification for fuel call for at least 87 octane, and it has a static compression ratio of 9.5 to 10.1, the slower burn rate of the higher octane fuel would be unnecessary in this situation.
Bullpup
[/quote]
Watch out, they’ll be along to misconstrue, misquote and misunderstandwhat you just said shortly just for the hell of it.