Over some recent discussion I have come across a new theory to me of taking higher tren/decca over a test base. Personally this is a new concept to me but on paper makes perfect sense; enough test to keep libido happy, more tren/decca for the real gains. Just generally interested in peoples experiences and more so if anyone always goes down one route or another.
I am planning on summer cycle of 50mg test p, 75mg tren a and 75mg mast p ed for 8 weeks. hcg @ 250iu 2 x per week. 0.5 armidex eod.
Never used caber. But as this is the first time tren is going to be higher than test I thought it would be good to have it?
Thoughts and opinions please![/quote]
Have you done bloodwork in the middle of other cycles to confirm caber shouldn’t be used? Yes, I would certainly at least have it.[/quote]
Here in the Uk its harder to get blood tests done as were not private you need a valid reason… of which gear use is not! And not only that my circle of gym buddies etc havent even heard of caber before. Ive had to reach far and wide to get it! Im going to be running 0.25 2 x per week.
Most my cycles have been organon sust250 @1ml eod or simple test enanthate wirh either tren hex or decca enanthate.
Any experience running tren higher than test?[/quote]
got ya. that makes sense.
I don’t personally, but I know others who agree with you, and I see no reason not to. I also know people who would simply say the best combo is high test, high tren… at the end of the day, you just have to see what works for you. I know that’s kind of a useless answer, but I think it’s the best one. If I were you I’d certainly give it a shot. It’s probably what I’ll do on my next run.