I want to wear my crucifix. And I mention that I attend Church on Sundays. I need to live and express my identity.
So āsubsidizing beliefsā in of itself isnāt wrong?
I want to wear my crucifix. And I mention that I attend Church on Sundays. I need to live and express my identity.
You have a choice though. Not everyone flaunts their irrationality.
Sloth:I want to wear my crucifix. And I mention that I attend Church on Sundays. I need to live and express my identity.
You have a choice though. Not everyone flaunts their irrationality.
I donāt have a choice about my feelings and identity.
So āsubsidizing beliefsā in of itself isnāt wrong?
Every subsidation is a subsidation of a belief. I can tell youāre trying to plan out some gotcha moment, but I canāt tell for the life of me what it is or why it would matter.
This will get much easier if you can just list the things you want unfunded in exchange for not subsidizing the religious industry
That is true, most believers suffer from varying degrees of coercion.
I donāt believe St Judeās is immune to property taxes, but I could be wrong. I was under the impression that was a church specific thing.
I have no idea. I just figure thatās the whole baby w/ the bathwater thing.
Sloth:So āsubsidizing beliefsā in of itself isnāt wrong?
Every subsidation is a subsidation of a belief. I can tell youāre trying to plan out some gotcha moment, but I canāt tell for the life of me what it is or why it would matter.
This will get much easier if you can just list the things you want unfunded in exchange for not subsidizing the religious industry
Defund everything. It wouldnāt just be about us two, after all. By the time we account for everyoneās beliefs, it will likely all be stripped.
That is true, most believers suffer from varying degrees of coercion.
Donāt know. Just telling you how I feel.
Defund everything.
Ah, well then Iāll have to decline your deal. Itās oddly unspecific and boring.
Have a good day
Sloth:Defund everything.
Ah, well then Iāll have to decline your deal. Itās oddly unspecific and boring.
Have a good day
It canāt be specific, it has to be total, as this isnāt just limited to our beliefs. A person could say defund the military, it is contrary to his values. Defund colleges for various reasons. So on and so forth.
Have a good day
You too, pfury. So far so good.
It canāt be specific, it has to be total, as this isnāt just limited to our beliefs. A person could say defund the military, it is contrary to his values. Defund colleges for various reasons. So on and so forth.
Except this theoretical deal isnāt between everyone. Itās between me and @pat and somehow you.
But Iām happy to drop it. Woulda been an interesting discussion point but youāre still stuck in 1 liner useless garbage mode with Zecarlo. Tbh Iād rather discuss religious universe theory with Pat than continue with whatever your latest bad gotcha moment is trying to be
Have a good one
Sloth:It canāt be specific, it has to be total, as this isnāt just limited to our beliefs. A person could say defund the military, it is contrary to his values. Defund colleges for various reasons. So on and so forth.
Except this theoretical deal isnāt between everyone. Itās between me and @pat and somehow you.
But Iām happy to drop it. Woulda been an interesting discussion point but youāre still stuck in 1 liner useless garbage mode with Zecarlo. Tbh Iād rather discuss religious universe theory with Pat than continue with whatever your latest bad gotcha moment is trying to be
Have a good one
I thought we were agreeing that subsidizing values and beliefs contrary to our own was wrong. And, I figured that extended to everyone else.
Thank you, you too!
I thought we were agreeing that subsidizing values and beliefs contrary to our own was wrong. And, I figured that extended to everyone else.
Oh well. Iāll hammer out the deal with Pat if he wades through the muk.
Sloth:I thought we were agreeing that subsidizing values and beliefs contrary to our own was wrong. And, I figured that extended to everyone else.
Oh well. Iāll hammer out the deal with Pat if he wades through the muk.
Pfury, thatās cool. If itās just a playful theoretical thing, I apologize. I assumed we werenāt so limitedā¦ My apologies to you and Pat.
If itās just a playful theoretical thing, I apologize
Iām not sure what else it could have been lol. I donāt actually have unilateral governmental power.
I assumed we werenāt so limitedā¦
I would say at bare minimum, weāre limited to the viewpoints of those in the discussion, as theyāre the only ones we can confirm exist. I donāt pretend to speak for others moral feelings, and wouldnāt dream of entertaining someone who was trying to do so.
My apologies.
Yeah, lets get rid of protected classes. Arguably, they all hold irrational beliefs. By definitionā¦
Thatās Senator Pat to you!
Thatās Senator Pat to you!
Well then how bout it senator? Defund PP and all abortion offering services in exchange for taxing churches?