'He Could Not Resist the Urge to Kill 3mo Old'

[quote]'nuffsaid wrote:

[quote]Oleena wrote:

BTW, some important background to the story above is that the Israeli soldiers ran into Mary’s church after shooting a bunch of men because the Church is considered a no-harm zone, regardless of what the people entering it had done. It’s in the journal.

I’m sure you can probably find more information on this girl’s work on the internets. She passed her exams and moved out of the country.[/quote]

Some more background is that the “massacre” at Jenin has been reveaaled for years as a big fat lie:
"On 1 August 2002 a UN Report showed that the Israeli figures were right; it said that 52 Palestinians had been killed in Jenin, the majority was proven as gunmen, and former Palestinian reports about 500 civilians killed - were not true. **

(**The Report of the Secretary-General prepared pursuant to General Assembly resolution ES-10/10 - 2002 [ http://www.un.org/peace/jenin/index.html Paragraph 56] says [quote] " Fifty-two Palestinian deaths had been confirmed by the hospital in Jenin by the end of May 2002. IDF also place the death toll at approximately 52. A senior Palestinian Authority official alleged in mid-April that some 500 were killed, a figure that has not been substantiated in the light of the evidence that has emerged." [unquote] )

The exact figure of civilians out of the 52 dead was more difficult to prove. The Israelis claimed 7 Palestinian civilian casualties. The Palestinians claimed twenty, however admitted that most of their dead had been fighters and took pride in killing 23 Israeli soldiers in the battle of Jenin. Israel paid the life of these 23 soldiers for doing a surgical land operation instead of air strikes in order to save the life of Palestinian civilians who were routinely used as human shield by Palestinian gunmen***. (***Quoting the UN Report: “Much of the fighting during Operation Defensive Shield occurred in areas heavily populated by civilians, in large part because the armed Palestinian groups sought by IDF placed their combatants and installations among civilians. Palestinian groups are alleged to have widely booby-trapped civilian homes…”) "

As for the “occupation”. SORRY! Like the partitioned territory in Pakistan, Kashmir, the West Bank is disputed territory. Gaza and East Jerusalem were ILLEGALLY invaded and occupied by Egypt and Jordan respectively in 1948. THis was territory that was unquestionably Israel’s.
The Israelis took these back in back in 1967.
The only reason any part of Israel is regarded as “illegally” occupied is because the Muslims took it over years after Jews and Christians were living in the land and in Islam, once Muslims have lived anywhere, even if they stole land from their original inhabitants, it is Islamic AND THEREFORE “ILLEGALLY” “occupied”. They look at Andalusia this way at the moment too, not just Israel and not just Kashmir.

The whole world belongs to Allah, in the eyes of Muslims, and the Muslim Brotherhood is actively campaigning in America and the rest of the world to render it all Muslim territory.

The war against Israel is a jihad conducted by Arab Muslims, of which the Palestinians are a part. Jihad is being waged against the rest of the world including America by Arabic Muslims and also by non-Arabic Muslims like the Muslims in Indonesia cf Bali bombing. In Russia it’s the Chechens, China the Uighurs etc.

Limiting this battle to the Israelis vs Palestinians hardly scratches the surface of the true scope of this awful situation. [/quote]

It gets tiresome proving over and over again to political noobs that the ‘facts’ and ‘sources’ they have just googled are actually completely discredited blood libels. Next she’ll be whining about the ‘murder’ of poor little Muhammad al-Durrah or the attack on the…erm…freedom flotilla.

Oleena: just accept your limitations. You have a nice body, you’re strong but you know jack about international politics/history and you are suffering from all the misapphrensions/delusions that oil money can buy.

Colonel Richard Kemp, former commander of British forces in Afghanistan and veteran of 14 tours of duty around the globe, testifies before the UN about the ‘ZIonist entity’s war crimes’ in Operation Cast Lead:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
No thanks Jewbacca, I have no interest in fighting other country’s war. Plus, since the US is $14 trillion in debt, I see no reason to subsidize other countries for that purpose.[/quote]

Israel is fighting OUR war. Who do you think Iran/Syria/Hamas/Hezbollah would be murdering if there weren’t Jews in Israel(apart from themselves)? Remember the Iranian hostage crisis? The US Marine barracks truck bombing in the Lebananon? The anti-American/Western propaganda that floods out these places? In Turkey for instance, Americans and other citizens of western democracies are referred to simply as ‘the Jews’.

Thank you Israel for fighting in the vanguard of OUR war.[/quote]

Sorry but that statement on Turkey is totally and utterly a fabrication and false

[quote]Bambi wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Israel is fighting OUR war. Who do you think Iran/Syria/Hamas/Hezbollah would be murdering if there weren’t Jews in Israel(apart from themselves)? Remember the Iranian hostage crisis? The US Marine barracks truck bombing in the Lebananon? The anti-American/Western propaganda that floods out these places? In Turkey for instance, Americans and other citizens of western democracies are referred to simply as ‘the Jews’.

Thank you Israel for fighting in the vanguard of OUR war.[/quote]

Sorry but that statement on Turkey is totally and utterly a fabrication and false[/quote]

It’s funny because Turkey and Israel have a pretty good relationship.

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Bambi wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Israel is fighting OUR war. Who do you think Iran/Syria/Hamas/Hezbollah would be murdering if there weren’t Jews in Israel(apart from themselves)? Remember the Iranian hostage crisis? The US Marine barracks truck bombing in the Lebananon? The anti-American/Western propaganda that floods out these places? In Turkey for instance, Americans and other citizens of western democracies are referred to simply as ‘the Jews’.

Thank you Israel for fighting in the vanguard of OUR war.[/quote]

Sorry but that statement on Turkey is totally and utterly a fabrication and false[/quote]

It’s funny because Turkey and Israel have a pretty good relationship.[/quote]

It’s also because (although there are radical elements within government) that Turkey is a secular country with enforced separation of religion and state. I’d quite like some backing up for that assertion but I doubt I’ll get any

[quote]Bambi wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
No thanks Jewbacca, I have no interest in fighting other country’s war. Plus, since the US is $14 trillion in debt, I see no reason to subsidize other countries for that purpose.[/quote]

Israel is fighting OUR war. Who do you think Iran/Syria/Hamas/Hezbollah would be murdering if there weren’t Jews in Israel(apart from themselves)? Remember the Iranian hostage crisis? The US Marine barracks truck bombing in the Lebananon? The anti-American/Western propaganda that floods out these places? In Turkey for instance, Americans and other citizens of western democracies are referred to simply as ‘the Jews’.

Thank you Israel for fighting in the vanguard of OUR war.[/quote]

Sorry but that statement on Turkey is totally and utterly a fabrication and false[/quote]

You’re a little out of date. Turkey used to be the most moderate/sane country in the Islamic world however since 9/11 there has been a 1400%(!) increase in the female murder rate. The current Turkish government has openly alligned itself with Iran and there are regular daily atrocities, for example the beheading of bishop Luigi Padovese.

1400%(!) increase in the murder rate of women between 2002 and 2009, revealed by Turkish MP:

http://www.vawnet.org/news/2011/02/turkeys-murder-rate-of-women-skyrockets-from-voa-news-com-22811/

Austrian MP describes the problems Austria is having with Turkish migrants:

And to the other dhimmiwit, Turkey sent the armed, martyrdom ‘freedom flotilla’ against Israel. Eight of the armed terrorists who were killed were Turks. One of the ships was flying a Turkish flag. Israeli/Turkish relations are comparable to Israeli/Iranian relations currently.

[quote]Bambi wrote:
It’s also because (although there are radical elements within government) that Turkey is a secular country with enforced separation of religion and state. I’d quite like some backing up for that assertion but I doubt I’ll get any
[/quote]

Where have you been? I hardly pay attention to current events, but even I know this is false. I suppose I know because of the BISHOP who was killed in Turkey and the enormous amounts of women being killed, what is it like 10x the amount since 2000?

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]Bambi wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
No thanks Jewbacca, I have no interest in fighting other country’s war. Plus, since the US is $14 trillion in debt, I see no reason to subsidize other countries for that purpose.[/quote]

Israel is fighting OUR war. Who do you think Iran/Syria/Hamas/Hezbollah would be murdering if there weren’t Jews in Israel(apart from themselves)? Remember the Iranian hostage crisis? The US Marine barracks truck bombing in the Lebananon? The anti-American/Western propaganda that floods out these places? In Turkey for instance, Americans and other citizens of western democracies are referred to simply as ‘the Jews’.

Thank you Israel for fighting in the vanguard of OUR war.[/quote]

Sorry but that statement on Turkey is totally and utterly a fabrication and false[/quote]

You’re a little out of date. Turkey used to be the most moderate/sane country in the Islamic world however since 9/11 there has been a 1400%(!) increase in the female murder rate. The current Turkish government has openly alligned itself with Iran and there are regular daily atrocities, for example the beheading of bishop Luigi Padovese.

1400%(!) increase in the murder rate of women between 2002 and 2009, revealed by Turkish MP:

http://www.vawnet.org/news/2011/02/turkeys-murder-rate-of-women-skyrockets-from-voa-news-com-22811/

Austrian MP describes the problems Austria is having with Turkish migrants:

And to the other dhimmiwit, Turkey sent the armed, martyrdom ‘freedom flotilla’ against Israel. Eight of the armed terrorists who were killed were Turks. One of the ships was flying a Turkish flag. Israeli/Turkish relations are comparable to Israeli/Iranian relations currently.[/quote]

And that related to Austrias problems with Turkish immigrants in what way?

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

And to the other dhimmiwit, Turkey sent the armed, martyrdom ‘freedom flotilla’ against Israel. Eight of the armed terrorists who were killed were Turks. One of the ships was flying a Turkish flag. Israeli/Turkish relations are comparable to Israeli/Iranian relations currently.[/quote]

Yeah well, attacking and capturing a vessel in international waters that carry another nations flag tends to sour relationships a bit, given that it is an act of war.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

And to the other dhimmiwit, Turkey sent the armed, martyrdom ‘freedom flotilla’ against Israel. Eight of the armed terrorists who were killed were Turks. One of the ships was flying a Turkish flag. Israeli/Turkish relations are comparable to Israeli/Iranian relations currently.[/quote]

Yeah well, attacking and capturing a vessel in international waters that carry another nations flag tends to sour relationships a bit, given that it is an act of war.

[/quote]

ACT OF WAR - any act occurring in the course of declared war; armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared, between two or more nations; or armed conflict between military forces of any origin.

  1. The vessels were private vessels.

  2. If they had been Turkish Naval vessels it would have been an ‘act of war’ to ignore the blockade.

  3. The Israelis boarded the vessels to enforce the blockade and were attacked with iron bars, stabbed etc. It was only due to some left-wing peaceniks onboard that they weren’t lynched.

  4. The Israelis offered to allow the ‘peace flotilla’ to dock at Ashod, have their cargo unloaded by UN personnel and delivered to Gaza. They refused.

  5. Please don’t respond if you can help it.

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

And to the other dhimmiwit, Turkey sent the armed, martyrdom ‘freedom flotilla’ against Israel. Eight of the armed terrorists who were killed were Turks. One of the ships was flying a Turkish flag. Israeli/Turkish relations are comparable to Israeli/Iranian relations currently.[/quote]

Yeah well, attacking and capturing a vessel in international waters that carry another nations flag tends to sour relationships a bit, given that it is an act of war.

[/quote]

ACT OF WAR - any act occurring in the course of declared war; armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared, between two or more nations; or armed conflict between military forces of any origin.

  1. The vessels were private vessels.

  2. If they had been Turkish Naval vessels it would have been an ‘act of war’ to ignore the blockade.

  3. The Israelis boarded the vessels to enforce the blockade and were attacked with iron bars, stabbed etc. It was only due to some left-wing peaceniks onboard that they weren’t lynched.

  4. The Israelis offered to allow the ‘peace flotilla’ to dock at Ashod, have their cargo unloaded by UN personnel and delivered to Gaza. They refused.

  5. Please don’t respond if you can help it.[/quote]

But how could I help it when you are so utterly wrong and so loud and proud about it on top of it?

Attacking a civilian vessel carrying another nations flag is indeed an act of war and you cannot enforce a blockade in international waters, especially not in rather cramped ones like the Mediterranean Sea.

Also, the people on board of this ship indeed were civilians, remember those people Israel allegedly does not target, and were perfectly within their rights to defend themselves against an act of war and/or piracy.

This is from Craig Murray, former Head of the Maritime Section of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office:

A word on the legal position, which is very plain. To attack a foreign flagged vessel in international waters is illegal. It is not piracy, as the Israeli vessels carried a military commission. It is rather an act of illegal warfare.

Because the incident took place on the high seas does not mean however that international law is the only applicable law. The Law of the Sea is quite plain that, when an incident takes place

on a ship on the high seas (outside anybodyâ??s territorial waters) the applicable law is that of the flag state of the ship on which the incident occurred. In legal terms, the Turkish ship was Turkish territory.

There are therefore two clear legal possibilities.

Possibility one is that the Israeli commandos were acting on behalf of the government of Israel in killing the activists on the ships. In that case Israel is in a position of war with Turkey, and the act falls under international jurisdiction as a war crime.

Possibility two is that, if the killings were not authorised Israeli military action, they were acts of murder under Turkish jurisdiction. If Israel does not consider itself in a position of war with Turkey, then it must hand over the commandos involved for trial in Turkey under Turkish law.

In brief, if Israel and Turkey are not at war, then it is Turkish law which is applicable to what happened on the ship. It is for Turkey, not Israel, to carry out any inquiry or investigation into events and to initiate any prosecutions. Israel is obliged to hand over indicted personnel for prosecution.

Phew, glad that I could lit a little candle in that abyss of ignorance I am quite sure you take to be an informed opinion.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

And to the other dhimmiwit, Turkey sent the armed, martyrdom ‘freedom flotilla’ against Israel. Eight of the armed terrorists who were killed were Turks. One of the ships was flying a Turkish flag. Israeli/Turkish relations are comparable to Israeli/Iranian relations currently.[/quote]

Yeah well, attacking and capturing a vessel in international waters that carry another nations flag tends to sour relationships a bit, given that it is an act of war.

[/quote]

ACT OF WAR - any act occurring in the course of declared war; armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared, between two or more nations; or armed conflict between military forces of any origin.

  1. The vessels were private vessels.

  2. If they had been Turkish Naval vessels it would have been an ‘act of war’ to ignore the blockade.

  3. The Israelis boarded the vessels to enforce the blockade and were attacked with iron bars, stabbed etc. It was only due to some left-wing peaceniks onboard that they weren’t lynched.

  4. The Israelis offered to allow the ‘peace flotilla’ to dock at Ashod, have their cargo unloaded by UN personnel and delivered to Gaza. They refused.

  5. Please don’t respond if you can help it.[/quote]

But how could I help it when you are so utterly wrong and so loud and proud about it on top of it?

Attacking a civilian vessel carrying another nations flag is indeed an act of war and you cannot enforce a blockade in international waters, especially not in rather cramped ones like the Mediterranean Sea.

Also, the people on board of this ship indeed were civilians, remember those people Israel allegedly does not target, and were perfectly within their rights to defend themselves against an act of war and/or piracy.

This is from Craig Murray, former Head of the Maritime Section of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office:

A word on the legal position, which is very plain. To attack a foreign flagged vessel in international waters is illegal. It is not piracy, as the Israeli vessels carried a military commission. It is rather an act of illegal warfare.

Because the incident took place on the high seas does not mean however that international law is the only applicable law. The Law of the Sea is quite plain that, when an incident takes place

on a ship on the high seas (outside anybody�??�??�?�¢??s territorial waters) the applicable law is that of the flag state of the ship on which the incident occurred. In legal terms, the Turkish ship was Turkish territory.

There are therefore two clear legal possibilities.

Possibility one is that the Israeli commandos were acting on behalf of the government of Israel in killing the activists on the ships. In that case Israel is in a position of war with Turkey, and the act falls under international jurisdiction as a war crime.

Possibility two is that, if the killings were not authorised Israeli military action, they were acts of murder under Turkish jurisdiction. If Israel does not consider itself in a position of war with Turkey, then it must hand over the commandos involved for trial in Turkey under Turkish law.

In brief, if Israel and Turkey are not at war, then it is Turkish law which is applicable to what happened on the ship. It is for Turkey, not Israel, to carry out any inquiry or investigation into events and to initiate any prosecutions. Israel is obliged to hand over indicted personnel for prosecution.

Phew, glad that I could lit a little candle in that abyss of ignorance I am quite sure you take to be an informed opinion.

[/quote]

Firstly, Craig Murray is a ‘political activist’ who was fired from the British foreign office for his ‘activism’. He knows nothing about international law.

Secondly, see ‘Akehurst’s modern introduction to international law’ regarding article 22 of the Convention of the High Seas. It states,

‘Even when there is no war, states sometimes claim a right to interfere with foreign merchant ships on the grounds of self-defence, but the law on this point is uncertain’

How is that ‘very plain’ you dickhead?

Thirdly, the Israelis never ‘attacked’ the vessels. They attempted to board them and THEY were immediately attacked. There is video showing an Israeli commando being bashed with an iron bar before he has set foot on the vessel whilst still rappelling down his line. Another was stabbed. Three of the victims had their guns taken from them which were then used to shoot at the helicopter.

Will you fuck off now?

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

And to the other dhimmiwit, Turkey sent the armed, martyrdom ‘freedom flotilla’ against Israel. Eight of the armed terrorists who were killed were Turks. One of the ships was flying a Turkish flag. Israeli/Turkish relations are comparable to Israeli/Iranian relations currently.[/quote]

Yeah well, attacking and capturing a vessel in international waters that carry another nations flag tends to sour relationships a bit, given that it is an act of war.

[/quote]

ACT OF WAR - any act occurring in the course of declared war; armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared, between two or more nations; or armed conflict between military forces of any origin.

  1. The vessels were private vessels.

  2. If they had been Turkish Naval vessels it would have been an ‘act of war’ to ignore the blockade.

  3. The Israelis boarded the vessels to enforce the blockade and were attacked with iron bars, stabbed etc. It was only due to some left-wing peaceniks onboard that they weren’t lynched.

  4. The Israelis offered to allow the ‘peace flotilla’ to dock at Ashod, have their cargo unloaded by UN personnel and delivered to Gaza. They refused.

  5. Please don’t respond if you can help it.[/quote]

But how could I help it when you are so utterly wrong and so loud and proud about it on top of it?

Attacking a civilian vessel carrying another nations flag is indeed an act of war and you cannot enforce a blockade in international waters, especially not in rather cramped ones like the Mediterranean Sea.

Also, the people on board of this ship indeed were civilians, remember those people Israel allegedly does not target, and were perfectly within their rights to defend themselves against an act of war and/or piracy.

This is from Craig Murray, former Head of the Maritime Section of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office:

A word on the legal position, which is very plain. To attack a foreign flagged vessel in international waters is illegal. It is not piracy, as the Israeli vessels carried a military commission. It is rather an act of illegal warfare.

Because the incident took place on the high seas does not mean however that international law is the only applicable law. The Law of the Sea is quite plain that, when an incident takes place

on a ship on the high seas (outside anybody�??�??�?�¢??s territorial waters) the applicable law is that of the flag state of the ship on which the incident occurred. In legal terms, the Turkish ship was Turkish territory.

There are therefore two clear legal possibilities.

Possibility one is that the Israeli commandos were acting on behalf of the government of Israel in killing the activists on the ships. In that case Israel is in a position of war with Turkey, and the act falls under international jurisdiction as a war crime.

Possibility two is that, if the killings were not authorised Israeli military action, they were acts of murder under Turkish jurisdiction. If Israel does not consider itself in a position of war with Turkey, then it must hand over the commandos involved for trial in Turkey under Turkish law.

In brief, if Israel and Turkey are not at war, then it is Turkish law which is applicable to what happened on the ship. It is for Turkey, not Israel, to carry out any inquiry or investigation into events and to initiate any prosecutions. Israel is obliged to hand over indicted personnel for prosecution.

Phew, glad that I could lit a little candle in that abyss of ignorance I am quite sure you take to be an informed opinion.

[/quote]

Firstly, Craig Murray is a ‘political activist’ who was fired from the British foreign office for his ‘activism’. He knows nothing about international law.

Secondly, see article 22 of the Convention of the High Seas. It states,

‘Even when there is no war, states sometimes claim a right to interfere with foreign merchant ships on the grounds of self-defence, but the law on this point is uncertain’

How is that ‘very plain’ you dickhead?

Thirdly, the Israelis never ‘attacked’ the vessels. They attempted to board them and THEY were immediately attacked. There is video showing an Israeli commando being bashed with an iron bar before he has set foot on the vessel whilst still rappelling down his line. Another was stabbed. Three of the victims had their guns taken from them which were then used to shoot at the helicopter.

Will you fuck off now?[/quote]

Craig Murray was fired for pointing out that the British and US Government were backing and supporting an Uzbekistan government that was boiling people and political opponents alive. Regardless of his political views, he is an expert on diplomacy

And I know Turkey has a violent jihadist element but there is still secular education. Still waiting for you to back up your assertion that the press refer to people from western countries as “jews”. And countering baseless assertions about the Turkish people =/ supporter of an Islamic caliphate, which I suppose is what you were asserting with the ‘dhimmi’ gag

[quote]Bambi wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

And to the other dhimmiwit, Turkey sent the armed, martyrdom ‘freedom flotilla’ against Israel. Eight of the armed terrorists who were killed were Turks. One of the ships was flying a Turkish flag. Israeli/Turkish relations are comparable to Israeli/Iranian relations currently.[/quote]

Yeah well, attacking and capturing a vessel in international waters that carry another nations flag tends to sour relationships a bit, given that it is an act of war.

[/quote]

ACT OF WAR - any act occurring in the course of declared war; armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared, between two or more nations; or armed conflict between military forces of any origin.

  1. The vessels were private vessels.

  2. If they had been Turkish Naval vessels it would have been an ‘act of war’ to ignore the blockade.

  3. The Israelis boarded the vessels to enforce the blockade and were attacked with iron bars, stabbed etc. It was only due to some left-wing peaceniks onboard that they weren’t lynched.

  4. The Israelis offered to allow the ‘peace flotilla’ to dock at Ashod, have their cargo unloaded by UN personnel and delivered to Gaza. They refused.

  5. Please don’t respond if you can help it.[/quote]

But how could I help it when you are so utterly wrong and so loud and proud about it on top of it?

Attacking a civilian vessel carrying another nations flag is indeed an act of war and you cannot enforce a blockade in international waters, especially not in rather cramped ones like the Mediterranean Sea.

Also, the people on board of this ship indeed were civilians, remember those people Israel allegedly does not target, and were perfectly within their rights to defend themselves against an act of war and/or piracy.

This is from Craig Murray, former Head of the Maritime Section of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office:

A word on the legal position, which is very plain. To attack a foreign flagged vessel in international waters is illegal. It is not piracy, as the Israeli vessels carried a military commission. It is rather an act of illegal warfare.

Because the incident took place on the high seas does not mean however that international law is the only applicable law. The Law of the Sea is quite plain that, when an incident takes place

on a ship on the high seas (outside anybody�??�??�??�?�¢??s territorial waters) the applicable law is that of the flag state of the ship on which the incident occurred. In legal terms, the Turkish ship was Turkish territory.

There are therefore two clear legal possibilities.

Possibility one is that the Israeli commandos were acting on behalf of the government of Israel in killing the activists on the ships. In that case Israel is in a position of war with Turkey, and the act falls under international jurisdiction as a war crime.

Possibility two is that, if the killings were not authorised Israeli military action, they were acts of murder under Turkish jurisdiction. If Israel does not consider itself in a position of war with Turkey, then it must hand over the commandos involved for trial in Turkey under Turkish law.

In brief, if Israel and Turkey are not at war, then it is Turkish law which is applicable to what happened on the ship. It is for Turkey, not Israel, to carry out any inquiry or investigation into events and to initiate any prosecutions. Israel is obliged to hand over indicted personnel for prosecution.

Phew, glad that I could lit a little candle in that abyss of ignorance I am quite sure you take to be an informed opinion.

[/quote]

Firstly, Craig Murray is a ‘political activist’ who was fired from the British foreign office for his ‘activism’. He knows nothing about international law.

Secondly, see article 22 of the Convention of the High Seas. It states,

‘Even when there is no war, states sometimes claim a right to interfere with foreign merchant ships on the grounds of self-defence, but the law on this point is uncertain’

How is that ‘very plain’ you dickhead?

Thirdly, the Israelis never ‘attacked’ the vessels. They attempted to board them and THEY were immediately attacked. There is video showing an Israeli commando being bashed with an iron bar before he has set foot on the vessel whilst still rappelling down his line. Another was stabbed. Three of the victims had their guns taken from them which were then used to shoot at the helicopter.

Will you fuck off now?[/quote]

Craig Murray was fired for pointing out that the British and US Government were backing and supporting an Uzbekistan government that was boiling people and political opponents alive. Regardless of his political views, he is an expert on diplomacy

And I know Turkey has a violent jihadist element but there is still secular education. Still waiting for you to back up your assertion that the press refer to people from western countries as “jews”. And countering baseless assertions about the Turkish people =/ supporter of an Islamic caliphate, which I suppose is what you were asserting with the ‘dhimmi’ gag[/quote]

  1. What the ape shit has Murray’s alleged ‘expert(ise) on diplomacy’ have to do with his proven ignorance of international law?

  2. I never mentioned the Turkish press. They just print cartoons of Jews with vampire fangs eating Arab babies and such. In fact the Turkish government decided to hold an anti-Semitic/anti-American cartoon festival in Instanbul in 2009. See this article entitled ‘Turkey pulls further away from the West’:

So you’re saying that the IDF weren’t attacking the boat, merely boarding it? to have a tea party no doubt. So they’re not to blame it’s the people attacking the heavy commando team jumping onto their boat in international waters, who are to blame?
I’d say that’s some pretty twisted logic. I support Israel normally but they dropped the ball on that one

Anyway back to thread, I agree with Jewbacca that this is an incredibly evil act but also agree that there is stupidity on both sides. Go me.

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

And to the other dhimmiwit, Turkey sent the armed, martyrdom ‘freedom flotilla’ against Israel. Eight of the armed terrorists who were killed were Turks. One of the ships was flying a Turkish flag. Israeli/Turkish relations are comparable to Israeli/Iranian relations currently.[/quote]

Yeah well, attacking and capturing a vessel in international waters that carry another nations flag tends to sour relationships a bit, given that it is an act of war.

[/quote]

ACT OF WAR - any act occurring in the course of declared war; armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared, between two or more nations; or armed conflict between military forces of any origin.

  1. The vessels were private vessels.

  2. If they had been Turkish Naval vessels it would have been an ‘act of war’ to ignore the blockade.

  3. The Israelis boarded the vessels to enforce the blockade and were attacked with iron bars, stabbed etc. It was only due to some left-wing peaceniks onboard that they weren’t lynched.

  4. The Israelis offered to allow the ‘peace flotilla’ to dock at Ashod, have their cargo unloaded by UN personnel and delivered to Gaza. They refused.

  5. Please don’t respond if you can help it.[/quote]

But how could I help it when you are so utterly wrong and so loud and proud about it on top of it?

Attacking a civilian vessel carrying another nations flag is indeed an act of war and you cannot enforce a blockade in international waters, especially not in rather cramped ones like the Mediterranean Sea.

Also, the people on board of this ship indeed were civilians, remember those people Israel allegedly does not target, and were perfectly within their rights to defend themselves against an act of war and/or piracy.

This is from Craig Murray, former Head of the Maritime Section of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office:

A word on the legal position, which is very plain. To attack a foreign flagged vessel in international waters is illegal. It is not piracy, as the Israeli vessels carried a military commission. It is rather an act of illegal warfare.

Because the incident took place on the high seas does not mean however that international law is the only applicable law. The Law of the Sea is quite plain that, when an incident takes place

on a ship on the high seas (outside anybody�??�??�??�?�¢??s territorial waters) the applicable law is that of the flag state of the ship on which the incident occurred. In legal terms, the Turkish ship was Turkish territory.

There are therefore two clear legal possibilities.

Possibility one is that the Israeli commandos were acting on behalf of the government of Israel in killing the activists on the ships. In that case Israel is in a position of war with Turkey, and the act falls under international jurisdiction as a war crime.

Possibility two is that, if the killings were not authorised Israeli military action, they were acts of murder under Turkish jurisdiction. If Israel does not consider itself in a position of war with Turkey, then it must hand over the commandos involved for trial in Turkey under Turkish law.

In brief, if Israel and Turkey are not at war, then it is Turkish law which is applicable to what happened on the ship. It is for Turkey, not Israel, to carry out any inquiry or investigation into events and to initiate any prosecutions. Israel is obliged to hand over indicted personnel for prosecution.

Phew, glad that I could lit a little candle in that abyss of ignorance I am quite sure you take to be an informed opinion.

[/quote]

Firstly, Craig Murray is a ‘political activist’ who was fired from the British foreign office for his ‘activism’. He knows nothing about international law.

Secondly, see ‘Akehurst’s modern introduction to international law’ regarding article 22 of the Convention of the High Seas. It states,

‘Even when there is no war, states sometimes claim a right to interfere with foreign merchant ships on the grounds of self-defence, but the law on this point is uncertain’

How is that ‘very plain’ you dickhead?

Thirdly, the Israelis never ‘attacked’ the vessels. They attempted to board them and THEY were immediately attacked. There is video showing an Israeli commando being bashed with an iron bar before he has set foot on the vessel whilst still rappelling down his line. Another was stabbed. Three of the victims had their guns taken from them which were then used to shoot at the helicopter.

Will you fuck off now?[/quote]

Murray was the Head of the British department that dealt with international law, whether he is a “political activist” has little to do with his opinion when it comes to the law of the high seas.

Also, if you come to my house uninvited and my house just happened to be terroritory of another souvereign nation you might get stabbed too, thats just how it goes.

Dont wanna get stabbed, stay the fuck off other peoples property.

Contrary to what some people believe you do not automatically have to roll over and spread them just because a thug in a government issued costume attempts to have his way with you.

And no, I wont.

[quote]Bambi wrote:
So you’re saying that the IDF weren’t attacking the boat, merely boarding it? to have a tea party no doubt. So they’re not to blame it’s the people attacking the heavy commando team jumping onto their boat in international waters, who are to blame?
I’d say that’s some pretty twisted logic. I support Israel normally but they dropped the ball on that one

Anyway back to thread, I agree with Jewbacca that this is an incredibly evil act but also agree that there is stupidity on both sides. Go me. [/quote]

Yes that’s what I’m saying. I’m saying if they weren’t attacked they would have verbally commanded the Captains to change course. If the Captains refused they would have used appropriate force to take control of the vessels. To suggest otherwise, based on previous Israeli behaviour is dishonest/stupid. The reason they used a Commando team is due to:

  1. The armed Jihadists on board who had professed their hopes of achieving martyrdom.

  2. The hostile intent shown by the vessels in refusing to obey orders not to enter Gaza and refusing to deliver their ‘aid’ via Ashod to have it inspected by international UN workers.

  3. Past experience with ‘peace’ activists who are members of Hezbollah and Hamas.

Are you suggesting that Israel should allow vessels from a hostile nation state to enter Israeli waters and dock at Gaza to deliver ‘aid’ that might very well include arms/munitions? If you lived in Sderot for example, and received regular Qassam barrages during school hours would this alter your opinions somewhat? What sort of reception do you think an unarmed Israeli boarding party would have received?

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

And to the other dhimmiwit, Turkey sent the armed, martyrdom ‘freedom flotilla’ against Israel. Eight of the armed terrorists who were killed were Turks. One of the ships was flying a Turkish flag. Israeli/Turkish relations are comparable to Israeli/Iranian relations currently.[/quote]

Yeah well, attacking and capturing a vessel in international waters that carry another nations flag tends to sour relationships a bit, given that it is an act of war.

[/quote]

ACT OF WAR - any act occurring in the course of declared war; armed conflict, whether or not war has been declared, between two or more nations; or armed conflict between military forces of any origin.

  1. The vessels were private vessels.

  2. If they had been Turkish Naval vessels it would have been an ‘act of war’ to ignore the blockade.

  3. The Israelis boarded the vessels to enforce the blockade and were attacked with iron bars, stabbed etc. It was only due to some left-wing peaceniks onboard that they weren’t lynched.

  4. The Israelis offered to allow the ‘peace flotilla’ to dock at Ashod, have their cargo unloaded by UN personnel and delivered to Gaza. They refused.

  5. Please don’t respond if you can help it.[/quote]

But how could I help it when you are so utterly wrong and so loud and proud about it on top of it?

Attacking a civilian vessel carrying another nations flag is indeed an act of war and you cannot enforce a blockade in international waters, especially not in rather cramped ones like the Mediterranean Sea.

Also, the people on board of this ship indeed were civilians, remember those people Israel allegedly does not target, and were perfectly within their rights to defend themselves against an act of war and/or piracy.

This is from Craig Murray, former Head of the Maritime Section of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office:

A word on the legal position, which is very plain. To attack a foreign flagged vessel in international waters is illegal. It is not piracy, as the Israeli vessels carried a military commission. It is rather an act of illegal warfare.

Because the incident took place on the high seas does not mean however that international law is the only applicable law. The Law of the Sea is quite plain that, when an incident takes place

on a ship on the high seas (outside anybody�??�??�??�??�??�?�¢??s territorial waters) the applicable law is that of the flag state of the ship on which the incident occurred. In legal terms, the Turkish ship was Turkish territory.

There are therefore two clear legal possibilities.

Possibility one is that the Israeli commandos were acting on behalf of the government of Israel in killing the activists on the ships. In that case Israel is in a position of war with Turkey, and the act falls under international jurisdiction as a war crime.

Possibility two is that, if the killings were not authorised Israeli military action, they were acts of murder under Turkish jurisdiction. If Israel does not consider itself in a position of war with Turkey, then it must hand over the commandos involved for trial in Turkey under Turkish law.

In brief, if Israel and Turkey are not at war, then it is Turkish law which is applicable to what happened on the ship. It is for Turkey, not Israel, to carry out any inquiry or investigation into events and to initiate any prosecutions. Israel is obliged to hand over indicted personnel for prosecution.

Phew, glad that I could lit a little candle in that abyss of ignorance I am quite sure you take to be an informed opinion.

[/quote]

Firstly, Craig Murray is a ‘political activist’ who was fired from the British foreign office for his ‘activism’. He knows nothing about international law.

Secondly, see ‘Akehurst’s modern introduction to international law’ regarding article 22 of the Convention of the High Seas. It states,

‘Even when there is no war, states sometimes claim a right to interfere with foreign merchant ships on the grounds of self-defence, but the law on this point is uncertain’

How is that ‘very plain’ you dickhead?

Thirdly, the Israelis never ‘attacked’ the vessels. They attempted to board them and THEY were immediately attacked. There is video showing an Israeli commando being bashed with an iron bar before he has set foot on the vessel whilst still rappelling down his line. Another was stabbed. Three of the victims had their guns taken from them which were then used to shoot at the helicopter.

Will you fuck off now?[/quote]

Murray was the Head of the British department that dealt with international law, whether he is a “political activist” has little to do with his opinion when it comes to the law of the high seas.

Also, if you come to my house uninvited and my house just happened to be terroritory of another souvereign nation you might get stabbed too, thats just how it goes.

Dont wanna get stabbed, stay the fuck off other peoples property.

Contrary to what some people believe you do not automatically have to roll over and spread them just because a thug in a government issued costume attempts to have his way with you.

And no, I wont.

[/quote]

“Murray was the Head of the British department that dealt with international law”

  • No he wasn’t. His only qualification is an MA in History and his ‘diplomatic expertise’ was so highly regarded by the British government that they awarded him the post of ambassador to Uzbekistan, of all places. Why are you claiming that he was ‘the Head of the British department that dealt with international law’? Which department is this?

EDIT: I didn’t realise you are the same idiot who was quoting Murray’s rubbish on international law. Please ignore questions.

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
How is that ‘very plain’ you dickhead?

Thirdly, the Israelis never ‘attacked’ the vessels. They attempted to board them and THEY were immediately attacked. There is video showing an Israeli commando being bashed with an iron bar before he has set foot on the vessel whilst still rappelling down his line. Another was stabbed. Three of the victims had their guns taken from them which were then used to shoot at the helicopter.

Will you fuck off now?[/quote]

oh, there’s more. ONe of the soldiers was dismeboweled by a Turk:
http://www.familybible.org/Israel/Conflict/PeacefulTerrorists.htm

Hello Uncle Erwin,

This is Amir writing you after reading what you sent to my father, Eitan. As you know, it was my unit and my friends who were on the ship. My commander was injured badly as a result of the â??pacifistsâ?? violence. I want to tell you how he was injured so you could tell the story. It shows just how horrible and inhuman were these activists. My commander was the first soldier that rappelled down from the helicopter to the ship. When he touched ground, he got hit in the head with a pole and stabbed in the stomach with a knife. When he drew out his secondary weaponâ??a handgun (his primary weapon was a regular paintball gun: a Tippman 98 custom)â??he was shot in the leg. He managed to fire a single shot before he was tossed from the balcony by 4 Arab activists to the lower deck (a 12-feet fall). He was then dragged by other activists to a room in the lower deck were he was stripped down by two activists. They took off his vest, helmet and shirt, leaving him with only his pants and shoes on. When they finished they took a knife and expanded the wound he already had in his stomach. They cut his ab[dominal] muscles horizontally and by hand spilled his guts out. When they finished they raised him up and walked him on the deck outside. He was conscious the whole time.

If you are asking yourself why they did all that, here comes the reason. They wanted to show the soldiers their commanderâ??s body so they will be demoralized and scared. Luckily, when they walked him on the deck a soldier saw him and managed to shoot the activist that was walking him down the outside corridor. He shot him with a special non-lethal bullet that didnâ??t kill him. My commander managed to jump from the deck to the water and swim to an army rescue boat (his guts still out of his body, and now in salty sea water). That was how he was saved. The activists that did this to him are alive, now in Turkey, and treated as heroes."

[quote]'nuffsaid wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
How is that ‘very plain’ you dickhead?

Thirdly, the Israelis never ‘attacked’ the vessels. They attempted to board them and THEY were immediately attacked. There is video showing an Israeli commando being bashed with an iron bar before he has set foot on the vessel whilst still rappelling down his line. Another was stabbed. Three of the victims had their guns taken from them which were then used to shoot at the helicopter.

Will you fuck off now?[/quote]

oh, there’s more. ONe of the soldiers was dismeboweled by a Turk:
http://www.familybible.org/Israel/Conflict/PeacefulTerrorists.htm

Hello Uncle Erwin,

This is Amir writing you after reading what you sent to my father, Eitan. As you know, it was my unit and my friends who were on the ship. My commander was injured badly as a result of the â??pacifistsâ?? violence. I want to tell you how he was injured so you could tell the story. It shows just how horrible and inhuman were these activists. My commander was the first soldier that rappelled down from the helicopter to the ship. When he touched ground, he got hit in the head with a pole and stabbed in the stomach with a knife. When he drew out his secondary weaponâ??a handgun (his primary weapon was a regular paintball gun: a Tippman 98 custom)â??he was shot in the leg. He managed to fire a single shot before he was tossed from the balcony by 4 Arab activists to the lower deck (a 12-feet fall). He was then dragged by other activists to a room in the lower deck were he was stripped down by two activists. They took off his vest, helmet and shirt, leaving him with only his pants and shoes on. When they finished they took a knife and expanded the wound he already had in his stomach. They cut his ab[dominal] muscles horizontally and by hand spilled his guts out. When they finished they raised him up and walked him on the deck outside. He was conscious the whole time.

If you are asking yourself why they did all that, here comes the reason. They wanted to show the soldiers their commanderâ??s body so they will be demoralized and scared. Luckily, when they walked him on the deck a soldier saw him and managed to shoot the activist that was walking him down the outside corridor. He shot him with a special non-lethal bullet that didnâ??t kill him. My commander managed to jump from the deck to the water and swim to an army rescue boat (his guts still out of his body, and now in salty sea water). That was how he was saved. The activists that did this to him are alive, now in Turkey, and treated as heroes."

[/quote]

Thanks for this link. I knew one of the soldiers suffered a serious stab wound in the abdomen but I was unaware of how it came about. The horrific details do not surprise me though.