[quote]Nick_Graham wrote:
Perhaps it wasn’t his most notable fight, but how does the Haye vs Mormeck fight get swept under the radar? Mormeck at the tome was the number 1 fighter in the world. Haye has a big mouth, but talent to back that up. Ill concede his rape remark was in very bad taste, BUT calling Solis fat is nothing. I see your argument about the ring being the decider of fitness, but Haye as a professional is entitled to critique another fighter, a grown man and professional.
[/quote]
Who? Who the fuck is Mormeck? Who the fuck cares about cruiserweights? These guys are nobodies. After he lost to Haye, he took a year off and then came back and it took him eight rounds to outpoint Vinny fucking MAddalone- another nobody.
You’re naming these fighters like they’re somebody- they’re nobodies. The whole cruiserweight division is under the radar, and has been since Holyfield. Even Haye’s big mouth couldn’t bring it back to the spotlight, and that’s why he moved up.
Again, I really have to question how much you know about boxing when you’re asking questions like this. But I know the answer, and honestly it’s cause you’re English, and the only two divisions you guys seem to know are super middlweight and cruiserweight, because that’s the only ones English fighters have success in.
Of course, SMW is no longer their domain either.
[quote]
In regards to Khan, I can not disagree more! He’s a great fighter and world champion. He’s got a great record and for his age has battled many fights. You seriously need to review the Khan fight. He took several HUGE hits, not one and continued well to win. His jaw is as good as the best. [/quote]
I watched it numerous times and scored him ahead by one round to a powerful fighter who has no footwork, movement, head movement, or speed.
He hasn’t battled many fights. He’s fought nobodies too- and, like the English press does- he beat up a washed up Barrerra on cuts and was crowned champion of the world.
Please. You guys amaze me.