T Nation

Hannity Then and Now on NSA Surveillance


#1

More hypocrisy from the arm of the right-wing political party disguising itself as an unbiased news source.

http://therealnews.com/t2/component/hwdvideoshare/viewvideo/76511/political-humor/hannity-then-and-now-on-nsa-surveillance


#2

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
More hypocrisy from the arm of the right-wing political party disguising itself as an unbiased news source.

http://therealnews.com/t2/component/hwdvideoshare/viewvideo/76511/political-humor/hannity-then-and-now-on-nsa-surveillance[/quote]

As reported from a hypocritical, radical left-winged biased source.


#3

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
More hypocrisy from the arm of the right-wing political party disguising itself as an unbiased news source.

http://therealnews.com/t2/component/hwdvideoshare/viewvideo/76511/political-humor/hannity-then-and-now-on-nsa-surveillance[/quote]

As reported from a hypocritical, radical left-winged biased source.[/quote]
So I guess it’s your contention that Hannity didn’t say those things?


#4

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
More hypocrisy from the arm of the right-wing political party disguising itself as an unbiased news source.

http://therealnews.com/t2/component/hwdvideoshare/viewvideo/76511/political-humor/hannity-then-and-now-on-nsa-surveillance[/quote]

As reported from a hypocritical, radical left-winged biased source.[/quote]
So I guess it’s your contention that Hannity didn’t say those things?[/quote]

No. It’s his contention that anything coming from your scam site is to be dismissed out of hand for being nothing but the progressive propagandist bullshit it is.


#5

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
More hypocrisy from the arm of the right-wing political party disguising itself as an unbiased news source.

http://therealnews.com/t2/component/hwdvideoshare/viewvideo/76511/political-humor/hannity-then-and-now-on-nsa-surveillance[/quote]

As reported from a hypocritical, radical left-winged biased source.[/quote]
So I guess it’s your contention that Hannity didn’t say those things?[/quote]

No. It’s his contention that anything coming from your scam site is to be dismissed out of hand for being nothing but the progressive propagandist bullshit it is. [/quote]
So Hannity did not say those things?


#6

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
More hypocrisy from the arm of the right-wing political party disguising itself as an unbiased news source.

http://therealnews.com/t2/component/hwdvideoshare/viewvideo/76511/political-humor/hannity-then-and-now-on-nsa-surveillance[/quote]

As reported from a hypocritical, radical left-winged biased source.[/quote]
So I guess it’s your contention that Hannity didn’t say those things?[/quote]

No. It’s his contention that anything coming from your scam site is to be dismissed out of hand for being nothing but the progressive propagandist bullshit it is. [/quote]

On the one hand yes, on the other hand, Hannity flip flopping depending on who holds the White House?

I dont have to look it up.

I am 90% certain that that is what it is.

I am terribly conflicted.


#7

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
More hypocrisy from the arm of the right-wing political party disguising itself as an unbiased news source.

http://therealnews.com/t2/component/hwdvideoshare/viewvideo/76511/political-humor/hannity-then-and-now-on-nsa-surveillance[/quote]

As reported from a hypocritical, radical left-winged biased source.[/quote]
So I guess it’s your contention that Hannity didn’t say those things?[/quote]

No. It’s his contention that anything coming from your scam site is to be dismissed out of hand for being nothing but the progressive propagandist bullshit it is. [/quote]

On the one hand yes, on the other hand, Hannity flip flopping depending on who holds the White House?

I dont have to look it up.

I am 90% certain that that is what it is.

I am terribly conflicted.[/quote]
This the typical caveman thinking of the right-wing talk show hosts. “Republicans good uh… Democrats baaaddd…”


#8

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
More hypocrisy from the arm of the right-wing political party disguising itself as an unbiased news source.

http://therealnews.com/t2/component/hwdvideoshare/viewvideo/76511/political-humor/hannity-then-and-now-on-nsa-surveillance[/quote]

As reported from a hypocritical, radical left-winged biased source.[/quote]
So I guess it’s your contention that Hannity didn’t say those things?[/quote]

No. It’s his contention that anything coming from your scam site is to be dismissed out of hand for being nothing but the progressive propagandist bullshit it is. [/quote]

On the one hand yes, on the other hand, Hannity flip flopping depending on who holds the White House?

I dont have to look it up.

I am 90% certain that that is what it is.

I am terribly conflicted.[/quote]
This the typical caveman thinking of the right-wing talk show hosts. “Republicans good uh… Democrats baaaddd…”
[/quote]

As opposed to Maddow and Oberman from MSNBC?

Christ you are dense.


#9

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
More hypocrisy from the arm of the right-wing political party disguising itself as an unbiased news source.

http://therealnews.com/t2/component/hwdvideoshare/viewvideo/76511/political-humor/hannity-then-and-now-on-nsa-surveillance[/quote]

As reported from a hypocritical, radical left-winged biased source.[/quote]
So I guess it’s your contention that Hannity didn’t say those things?[/quote]

No. It’s his contention that anything coming from your scam site is to be dismissed out of hand for being nothing but the progressive propagandist bullshit it is. [/quote]

On the one hand yes, on the other hand, Hannity flip flopping depending on who holds the White House?

I dont have to look it up.

I am 90% certain that that is what it is.

I am terribly conflicted.[/quote]
This the typical caveman thinking of the right-wing talk show hosts. “Republicans good uh… Democrats baaaddd…”
[/quote]

As opposed to Maddow and Oberman from MSNBC?

Christ you are dense.[/quote]

So you admit to Hannity’s guilt and hypocrisy?


#10

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
More hypocrisy from the arm of the right-wing political party disguising itself as an unbiased news source.

http://therealnews.com/t2/component/hwdvideoshare/viewvideo/76511/political-humor/hannity-then-and-now-on-nsa-surveillance[/quote]

As reported from a hypocritical, radical left-winged biased source.[/quote]
So I guess it’s your contention that Hannity didn’t say those things?[/quote]

No. It’s his contention that anything coming from your scam site is to be dismissed out of hand for being nothing but the progressive propagandist bullshit it is. [/quote]

On the one hand yes, on the other hand, Hannity flip flopping depending on who holds the White House?

I dont have to look it up.

I am 90% certain that that is what it is.

I am terribly conflicted.[/quote]
This the typical caveman thinking of the right-wing talk show hosts. “Republicans good uh… Democrats baaaddd…”
[/quote]

As opposed to Maddow and Oberman from MSNBC?

Christ you are dense.[/quote]

So you admit to Hannity’s guilt and hypocrisy?
[/quote]

Are you admitting that FOXnews and MSNBC are the same, at opposite ends of the spectrum?

I’m sure there is something on Rush’s site quoting hypocrisy from the left…but you would never admit to it.

And that’s it, I am not giving anymore credence to your pet website.


#11

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:
More hypocrisy from the arm of the right-wing political party disguising itself as an unbiased news source.

http://therealnews.com/t2/component/hwdvideoshare/viewvideo/76511/political-humor/hannity-then-and-now-on-nsa-surveillance[/quote]

As reported from a hypocritical, radical left-winged biased source.[/quote]
So I guess it’s your contention that Hannity didn’t say those things?[/quote]

No. It’s his contention that anything coming from your scam site is to be dismissed out of hand for being nothing but the progressive propagandist bullshit it is. [/quote]

On the one hand yes, on the other hand, Hannity flip flopping depending on who holds the White House?

I dont have to look it up.

I am 90% certain that that is what it is.

I am terribly conflicted.[/quote]
This the typical caveman thinking of the right-wing talk show hosts. “Republicans good uh… Democrats baaaddd…”
[/quote]

As opposed to Maddow and Oberman from MSNBC?

Christ you are dense.[/quote]

So you admit to Hannity’s guilt and hypocrisy?
[/quote]

Are you admitting that FOXnews and MSNBC are the same, at opposite ends of the spectrum?

I’m sure there is something on Rush’s site quoting hypocrisy from the left…but you would never admit to it.

And that’s it, I am not giving anymore credence to your pet website.[/quote]

I do not support the left blindly, if Rush has something on his website pointing out the hypocrisy then post it.


#12

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

I do not support the left blindly, if Rush has something on his website pointing out the hypocrisy then post it.
[/quote]

You blindly support a radical left-wing progressive propaganda website. So yeah - you support the left blindly. You have since you started posting the crap from your website 5 years ago.


#13

Hannity may be a “conservative”(whatever that is), but he is no lover of freedom. I don’t think that’s news to anyone. I would also say he doesn’t seem to be particularly intelligent.


#14

[quote]NickViar wrote:
Hannity may be a “conservative”(whatever that is), but he is no lover of freedom. I don’t think that’s news to anyone. I would also say he doesn’t seem to be particularly intelligent.[/quote]

I can’t stand Hannity. Or that O’Reilley. Both are pro-big government RINO’s who have an audience to entertain.


#15

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]NickViar wrote:
Hannity may be a “conservative”(whatever that is), but he is no lover of freedom. I don’t think that’s news to anyone. I would also say he doesn’t seem to be particularly intelligent.[/quote]

I can’t stand Hannity. Or that O’Reilley. Both are pro-big government RINO’s who have an audience to entertain.

[/quote]

O’Reilly’s the worst. Hannity at least seems to be good-hearted(though ignorant/stupid). He’s just comes off as a geek who’s scared of his shadow. They are definitely two big-government guys though.


#16

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

I do not support the left blindly, if Rush has something on his website pointing out the hypocrisy then post it.
[/quote]

You blindly support a radical left-wing progressive propaganda website. So yeah - you support the left blindly. You have since you started posting the crap from your website 5 years ago. [/quote]
They disseminate points of view the corporate media wouldn’t dare. So I do support real journalism not the kind filtered by the corporate owners. So yes I’m bias to those who want to find out the truth rather than tow the line of their ideology despite the evidence. It is you who is a blind follower, a sheep of sorts.


#17

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

I do not support the left blindly, if Rush has something on his website pointing out the hypocrisy then post it.
[/quote]

You blindly support a radical left-wing progressive propaganda website. So yeah - you support the left blindly. You have since you started posting the crap from your website 5 years ago.

[/quote]
They disseminate points of view the corporate media wouldn’t dare. So I do support real journalism not the kind filtered by the corporate owners. So yes I’m bias to those who want to find out the truth rather than tow the line of their ideology despite the evidence. It is you who is a blind follower, a sheep of sorts.[/quote]

They are corporate media dipshit. The proof is right in plain site - right here in PWI. Your blind faith is laughable. They take corporate money and lie to the little lemmings like you who swallow their load of shit like a thirsty 2-dollar whore.


#18

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

I do not support the left blindly, if Rush has something on his website pointing out the hypocrisy then post it.
[/quote]

You blindly support a radical left-wing progressive propaganda website. So yeah - you support the left blindly. You have since you started posting the crap from your website 5 years ago.

[/quote]
They disseminate points of view the corporate media wouldn’t dare. So I do support real journalism not the kind filtered by the corporate owners. So yes I’m bias to those who want to find out the truth rather than tow the line of their ideology despite the evidence. It is you who is a blind follower, a sheep of sorts.[/quote]

They are corporate media dipshit. The proof is right in plain site - right here in PWI. Your blind faith is laughable. They take corporate money and lie to the little lemmings like you who swallow their load of shit like a thirsty 2-dollar whore. [/quote]
They have taken money from family foundations. This is not a corporation. And how are they being controlled by taking this money? Dipshit!


#19

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

I do not support the left blindly, if Rush has something on his website pointing out the hypocrisy then post it.
[/quote]

You blindly support a radical left-wing progressive propaganda website. So yeah - you support the left blindly. You have since you started posting the crap from your website 5 years ago.

[/quote]
They disseminate points of view the corporate media wouldn’t dare. So I do support real journalism not the kind filtered by the corporate owners. So yes I’m bias to those who want to find out the truth rather than tow the line of their ideology despite the evidence. It is you who is a blind follower, a sheep of sorts.[/quote]

They are corporate media dipshit. The proof is right in plain site - right here in PWI. Your blind faith is laughable. They take corporate money and lie to the little lemmings like you who swallow their load of shit like a thirsty 2-dollar whore. [/quote]
They have taken money from family foundations. This is not a corporation. And how are they being controlled by taking this money? Dipshit![/quote]

Yeah. Posting what you post and linking to what you link to pretty much makes you calling someone a dipshit - well - just plain funny.


#20

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

[quote]drunkpig wrote:

[quote]Zeppelin795 wrote:

I do not support the left blindly, if Rush has something on his website pointing out the hypocrisy then post it.
[/quote]

You blindly support a radical left-wing progressive propaganda website. So yeah - you support the left blindly. You have since you started posting the crap from your website 5 years ago.

[/quote]
They disseminate points of view the corporate media wouldn’t dare. So I do support real journalism not the kind filtered by the corporate owners. So yes I’m bias to those who want to find out the truth rather than tow the line of their ideology despite the evidence. It is you who is a blind follower, a sheep of sorts.[/quote]

They are corporate media dipshit. The proof is right in plain site - right here in PWI. Your blind faith is laughable. They take corporate money and lie to the little lemmings like you who swallow their load of shit like a thirsty 2-dollar whore. [/quote]
They have taken money from family foundations. This is not a corporation. And how are they being controlled by taking this money? Dipshit![/quote]

Yeah. Posting what you post and linking to what you link to pretty much makes you calling someone a dipshit - well - just plain funny.
[/quote]
You cannot thoroughly defend your argument so you have to switch gears so the fact that you are absolutely busted isn’t so apparent.