[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]xilinx wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]xilinx wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]xilinx wrote:
ProfX, people won’t come to Vegas to see an Olympia where such a physique wins??[/quote]
What are you talking about?
Back then, he was one of the biggest dudes on stage.
Today, he would not be.
He also competed recently enough for most people to still remember it.
Today, they would likely treat him like Ced Mcmillan is being treated…hyped but constantly pushed to get even bigger…which is exactly what Wheeler ended up doing.
That is why you guys didn’t pick a vid of his later career.
You picked this one.[/quote]
I’m not ‘they’ or ‘you guys’. I AM saying, if aesthetics were placed highest, there would be a stage full of flex-type competitors, and no one would be pushed to get bigger, just refine. Ronnie wasn’t all bad early on (well, there are those strange abdominals).
Dont know what would have become of Rhul, then. Probably the same - compete for the fans of Freak, place more or less the same.
I say, make 2 olympias - O Aesthetics, and O Size. Ruhl must be enjoying doing what he does, and has his fans, so why not.[/quote]
The thing is, this comes down to MONEY. Yeah, in an ideal world, the most “aesthetic” person would always win a bodybuilding contest.
They already have a 202 class and it keeps getting dominated by one of the biggest short fuckers on the planet.
The judges decide that…and then the fans reinforce by buying the mags with them in the cover.
Trust me, if the look you mention sold to fans of bodybuilding, it would already be happening.
…so tell me…when was the last muscle mag you bought?[/quote]
I realize that I don’t represent the market, which is why I dont buy those advertizements aka magazines (also, they cost >10$ by the time they’re on sale here), and hardly follow the competitions.
But this thread was ‘what are your opinions’. This is my opinion.
[/quote]
…and my point is, this opinion is usually screamed by people who don’t support the sport at all. I still buy those magazines. I don’t buy them as much as I used to, but I will still pick up MD at times.
People who follow bodybuilding tend to actually understand the changes that occur over time. They don’t ignore the HUGE changes in expectations since the 1960’s including hugely different standards for quad size and back.
So yea, it kind of does matter if you support it at all…because otherwise, expecting all progress to have ended 50 years ago is a little silly, to be honest.[/quote]
Lol… you dont just disagree, you need to find some way to explain why my opinion is Wrong… like trying to explain that banana ice cream is wrong because somehow I dont support the strawberry industry but you do, so I’m wrong in some straw man way.
Why can’t you converse with me, 1:1, you keep grouping me with this or that group.