“I tried the whole 'Go read passages of Dreams of My Father and see Obama is a Muslim who hates Jews and white people”, but one of them actually had a copy of the book and went to the page to see I had lied! Now this one guy actually reads the court cases I misrepresent and another guy actually has actual data on Trump’s financial mediocrity!! WE’RE LOSING THEM AND I AM RUNNING OUT OF LIES - TELL ME WHAT I NEED TO SAY!!!1!! IT’S NOT WORKING!!1!!
You said a business man who is worth 10 billion dollars is not a good business man. I need much more of an explanation for that comment. All you’ve said so far is rooted in emotion.
You said Joe Biden is a great negotiator. This one is even puzzling to life long democrats I’m sure as Joe Biden is no more than a political hack who got lucky and was chosen to be VP. Did he ever have a real job? I honestly don’t know but I doubt it highly. Very much like Bernie Sanders in that regard.
Finally your coup de gras, you claimed that a corrupt, oh so corrupt, politician who was a failed Senator and a failed Secretary of State with gigantic character issues and still may be indicted on corruption based on the Clinton Foundation “would be better for the country both in the short and long term”. Those are YOUR WORDS.
All of that really, really needs explaining. And not just to me there are probably a few people that you puzzled with those remarks.
Now get to it before your lackey grows tired of his cut and paste barrage. You should really treat him better. Give him a pat on the head now and then …and maybe a cookie.
usmccds: “That’s funny TB you are so smart, I’m a lot like you TB right? When I grow up I wanna be just like you TB. Can we do something together tonight TB? Anything really…can you huh”?
Ha… that is what we are reading junior and it looks really bad.
This is your present disagreement with TB, Zeb. In its entirety.
Now, for those of us who are following along, and in the interest of clarity (your nemesis, I know), are you still claiming that Garland got the case in question wrong by way of an anti-gun bias?
Yes
Or
No?
And if yes, what did TB’s summary of Garland’s opinion misrepresent or leave out? Be specific and clear – for the love of god, be specific and clear.
I’ve explained all of them, some of them re-hashed in the last 24 hours. You know it, everyone read jt, so they know it. You just want to get into a discussion about something else to avoid having to address the Garland stuff.
If you’re really interested in what I had to say on those matters, avail yourself of the search engine you see at the top of your screen.
What hasn’t happened is you providing backup for your claims that Garland, operating under an “anti gun” bias, got four cases wrong.
Let’s start with the one above. How did Garland get the criminal sentencing case wrong?