So here’s the story, a commercial pilot refuses to go through the full body scanner (scatter/ short wave radiation system). Supposedly these things can go through clothing and produce near naked images. Also the systems allow the scanners to store and send images. What do you guys think of this? Honestly my opinion, I don’t really care, I’ve gone through a lot of them and don’t really mind. I’m not sure how there is a constitutional violation here.
I’ve flown twice since they’ve been in place and been randomly scanned twice
It doesn’t really bother me for modesty’s sake but it is still a violation of privacy and completely unnecessary IMO. And I didn’t get to see the pictures!
[quote]debraD wrote:
I’ve flown twice since they’ve been in place and been randomly scanned twice
It doesn’t really bother me for modesty’s sake but it is still a violation of privacy and completely unnecessary IMO. And I didn’t get to see the pictures! [/quote]
[quote]Mick28 wrote:
you can’t see how this is a violation of privacy? you are messed up buddy. the next thing they’ll want to do is look up the crack of your ass. will you mind that? where does this madness end?[/quote]
Pretty much what I mean by “violation of privacy” is Constitutionally. I can see for modesty or violation of personal privacy ya I agree they can be. I really need to work on how I word my openings
[quote]serpiente-6509 wrote:
So here’s the story, a commercial pilot refuses to go through the full body scanner (scatter/ short wave radiation system). Supposedly these things can go through clothing and produce near naked images. Also the systems allow the scanners to store and send images. What do you guys think of this? Honestly my opinion, I don’t really care, I’ve gone through a lot of them and don’t really mind. I’m not sure how there is a constitutional violation here.
I agree with the pilots decision not to go through the whole scanner because well… nobody does whole body scanners. It makes no sense. All the big guys use body part scanners done 5+ times a week.