Did you even read the article? Probably not because you know everything. Right, champ!
They seem to have a great deal of proof. Proof that tobacco campaign contributions were the driving force behind Sessionsâ anti MJ stance. As if he wasnât anti MJ before.
Just like Fox knew that Obamaâs opposition to the Keystone XL Pipeline was a direct result of Warren Buffetâs campaign contributions (his trains carried the oil after all).
Nevermind that Sessions is an old white man who still believes in the war on drugs and enforcing existing federal laws⊠nope, must be that tobacco money.
Nevermind that Obama was trying to achieve a climate change agenda and wouldnât cross the green lobby by approving a pipeline⊠nope, must be the Berkshire money.
This conspiracy theory stuff is fun.
2 Likes
1 Like
So why donât you ask Big Tobacco why they ought to take your advice. Maybe there is a good job in it for you seeing how youâre so brilliant. Now that makes so much sense.
So they inherited a house, then sold it to buy another. So you think this makes his message hypocritical?
So not having a Super-Pac or taking corporate bribes makes one a commie.
Pot doesnât have the detrimental effects of tobacco when smoked in the way normal Americans smoke them. Big tobacco doesnât want cannabis legalized as it would represent competition for them. And remember corporations hate competition while they try to corner a monopoly.
Nobody likes that. Especially elite banksters and Big executives.
You know what I mean.
Generational transfer of wealth. Hypocritical, check.
Their 3rd. Hypocritical, check.
Umm, ya.
So true.
Examples?
Yes, because he doesnât take corporate bribes.
You mean aside from his 3 houses? Loves regulation? Curious how what you would accept as an example - your standards are pretty ⊠well ⊠your standards(?)
Sessions is an absolute idiot who says that marijuana is almost as bad as heroin. Does he have any proof of that statement? Does anyone REALLY believe that notion? No. So why does he say such things?
Not a conspiracy, just following the money. He, like the overwhelming majority of politicians, is nothing more than a whipping boy for corporations.
Did they cheat on their taxes or have lobbyists manipulate the tax laws for their own financial gain?
You clearly donât understand his message.
Lol. The man blames the top 1% for literally every ill known to man and he is the 1%.
Itâs fucking comical youâre defending him. Fucking comical.
Not that this has anything at all to do with what I posted (as usual), but thanks for more of your idelogically driven lolz.
Sarcasm is a thing.
No, because he doesnât really want real communism. He wants some fantasy version just like the college students who preach communist and socialist valuesâŠwhile drinking Starbucks coffee, faces buried in their iPhones. And when they settle down and plan on marriage and family, they are going to want to live in neighborhoods far from the ghetto and the working class. They will still mock the âdeplorablesâ even though if anyone should be a communist, itâs a deplorable.
1 Like
He received an inheritance from his father in 1963 and he and his wife inherited a house. They sold that house and bought another. Iâd be interested to see if he used a 1031 exchange (no capital gains tax on the RE if you buy a new one in 90 days) on it, since he proposed ending that program in 2015.
For a guy who hates generational wealth and tax loopholes, he had no problem accepting inheritances⊠twice.
1 Like