T Nation

Evangelical Pentagon


Not so fast, Christian soldiers

[i]Maybe what the war in Iraq needs is not more troops but more religion. At least that's the message the Department of Defense seems to be sending.

Last week, after an investigation spurred by the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, the Pentagon abruptly announced that it would not be delivering "freedom packages" to our soldiers in Iraq, as it had originally intended.

What were the packages to contain? Not body armor or home-baked cookies. Rather, they held Bibles, proselytizing material in English and Arabic and the apocalyptic computer game "Left Behind: Eternal Forces" (derived from the series of post-Rapture novels), in which "soldiers for Christ" hunt down enemies who look suspiciously like U.N. peacekeepers.

The packages were put together by a fundamentalist Christian ministry called Operation Straight Up, or OSU. Headed by former kickboxer Jonathan Spinks, OSU is an official member of the Defense Department's "America Supports You" program. The group has staged a number of Christian-themed shows at military bases, featuring athletes, strongmen and actor-turned-evangelist Stephen Baldwin. But thanks in part to the support of the Pentagon, Operation Straight Up has now begun focusing on Iraq, where, according to its website (on pages taken down last week), it planned an entertainment tour called the "Military Crusade."

Apparently the wonks at the Pentagon forgot that Muslims tend to bristle at the word "crusade" and thought that what the Iraq war lacked was a dose of end-times theology.

In the end, the Defense Department realized the folly of participating in any Operation Straight Up crusade. But the episode is just another example of increasingly disturbing, and indeed unconstitutional, relationships being forged between the U.S. military and private evangelical groups.

Take, for instance, the recent scandal involving Christian Embassy, a group whose expressed purpose is to proselytize to military personnel, diplomats, Capitol Hill staffers and political appointees. In a shocking breach of security, Defense Department officials allowed a Christian Embassy film crew to roam the corridors of the Pentagon unescorted while making a promotional video featuring high-ranking officers and political appointees. (Christian Embassy, which holds prayer meetings weekly at the Pentagon, is so entrenched that Air Force Maj. Gen. John J. Catton Jr. said he'd assumed the organization was a "quasi-federal entity.")

The Pentagon's inspector general recently released a report recommending unspecified "corrective action" for those officers who appeared in the video for violating Defense Department regulations. But, in a telling gesture, the report avoided any discussion of how allowing an evangelical group to function within the Defense Department is an obvious violation of the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment.

The extent to which such relationships have damaged international goodwill toward the U.S. is beyond measure. As the inspector general noted, a leading Turkish newspaper, Sabah, published an article on Air Force Maj. Gen. Peter Sutton, who is the U.S. liaison to the Turkish military -- and who appeared in the Christian Embassy video. The article described Christian Embassy as a "radical fundamentalist sect," perhaps irreparably damaging Sutton's primary job objective of building closer ties to the Turkish General Staff, which has expressed alarm at the influence of fundamentalist Christian groups inside the U.S. military.

Our military personnel swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution, not the Bible. Yet by turning a blind eye to OSU and Christian Embassy activities, the Pentagon is, in essence, endorsing their proselytizing. And sometimes it's more explicit than that.

That certainly was the case with Army Lt. Gen. William "Jerry" Boykin, deputy undersecretary of Defense for intelligence. The Pentagon put him in charge of the hunt for Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda in 2003. The same year, Boykin was found to be touring American churches, where he gave speeches -- in uniform -- casting the Iraq war in end-times terms. "We're in is a spiritual battle," he told one congregation in Oregon. "Satan wants to destroy this nation . . . and he wants to destroy us as a Christian army." The story wound up in newspapers, magazines and on "60 Minutes." And, of course, it was reported all over the Muslim world. The Pentagon reacted with a collective shrug.

American military and political officials must, at the very least, have the foresight not to promote crusade rhetoric in the midst of an already religion-tinged war. Many of our enemies in the Mideast already believe that the world is locked in a contest between Christianity and Islam. Why are our military officials validating this ludicrous claim with their own fiery religious rhetoric?

It's time to actively strip the so-called war on terror of its religious connotations, not add to them. Because religious wars are not just ugly, they are unwinnable. And despite what Operation Straight Up and its supporters in the Pentagon may think is taking place in Iraq, the Rapture is not a viable exit strategy.[/i]


Now, the million dollar question: Why are Iraqis shooting at US "liberators"?


So they didn't deliver the packages.

Is your claim that muslims are murdering each other as well as Americans because someone had planned on shipping Bibles to Iraq?


Now you're suggesting that this is a war based in religion?

Had enough of blaming the USA, so you're starting up on blaming Christians?

Specifically, American Christians... is this the paper tiger you're propping up? Iraqis are shooting Christian Americans for their faith or because they are acting as missionaries?

You understand I have so many questions because you leave such a loaded question. Be that as it may, your true colors come out loud and clear. Anti-American and anti-Jesus. Not only that, but that question also suggests aggression as the means to fight this hostile invasion.

I know this isn't fair, but it comes across that you are for the killing of followers of Jesus. That they are Americans makes it all the sweeter.

All this from a self proclaimed pacifist. Is it beginning to be clear why so many of us at T-Nation call you out so often?


Christians are always getting used to gain sympathy.


No. The LA Times did.

What I tried to convey with my question was that this kind of shit combined with Bush's "I'm the hand of God" speeches make this war perceived as a religious war in the region.

It's also naive to think that no US soldiers are seeing this conflict thru a religious lens. That adds to the prevailing feeling amongst Iraqis of being in a modern crusade.


As opposed to being naive to the fact that the terrorists are killing innocent people because their god told them to?

The pentagon stopped the shipments. It was done by a private organization. Too bad your brothers in blood can't understand such basic freedoms.


I know a guy who served in the first Gulf war as a chapplain. He was not allowed to show his collar, cross or Bible while stationed in Saudi Arabia because it might offend someone.

Why are they shooting at American Liberators? because they do not want the US model of democracy to work in Iraq and would rather see millions die and the would be rich country turned to a hell.


This reminds me of the time when bibles where smuggled to the Soviet Union.


Give me a break.


If I were Muslim, my million dollar questions would be:

"Why are my Muslim brothers blowing each other up?"

I think it is widely acknowledged that when we leave Iraq it will become a blood bath of Muslim on Muslim slaughter.

The number of innocent civilians our military has killed will pale in comparison to the slaughter that Muslims will inflict on each other.


It already does pale in comparison.


True. But we'll still be responsible somehow even when we're gone. (sarcasm)