[quote]Bambi wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]mertdawg wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]mertdawg wrote:
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
Anyone basing their views on the economy on religion is starting off on the wrong foot, as the two are unrelated. I’m not religious at all, but I believe in conservative economic principles because I believe they cause the most good for the highest number of people and increase the standard of living across all economic boundaries. Instead of focusing on who gets what slice of the pie (liberal economic policies), conservative economic principles increase the overall size of the pie so everyone gets more. [/quote]
What I really want to know is why do atheists tend to be economic liberals? I could see someone understand conservative principals do the most good, but decide to be economically liberal out of compassion, but I wouldn’t expect an athiest to do this.[/quote]
You wouldn’t expect an atheist to be compassionate?
Maybe you’re on to something. Atheists dont believe in a flying wizard man up in the sky, so they believe taking care of other human beings is up to -ya know- the rest of us human beings. [/quote]
I am asking if it is rational to do so. Prove to me that humans should morally be generous. OK, maybe it cuts down on revolutions and stuff. People have an innate desire to help others. Its a drive that may defy logic though.
Granted, I firmly believe that conservative economics produces the most good for the poorest. Conservative principals increase the size of the pie. Liberal ones bring the richer down 3 steps and the poorer down 1 step, but heck its fairer right?
[/quote]
Its rational in the sense that we have a built in desire to help others - we’re programmed to because helping each other is the only thing that has allowed our species to survive.
I dont think its a matter of policies, really. There are examples of socialist countries that fail and socialist countries that prosper, same with any economy.[/quote]
Example of socialist countries that prosper please.
[/quote]
EDIT: Countries with extensive social programs fare very well on the HDI and have lower inequality but that is not socialism. Just clarifying the post[/quote]
Lower inequality is not a virtue in and of itself, the HDI is highly subjective and due to the incommensurabilty of hapiness virtually meaningless, and even if all of this were not so, those countries are practically bancrupt, which does not bode well for the happiness of their people.
Even if you could buy happiness on the back of the most productive of societies memhbers, you can only do so a very short time, which incidentally seems to be the planning horizon for democratically elected officals.