I guess I’m questioning the validity of “the Left is doing this intentionally”.
Sorry, it’s right out of the Saul Alinsky playbook, and they do it repeatedly.
There IS a conspiracy to manipulate the news and promote a certain agenda. I mean, it’s been busted repeatedly — remember the “Jornolist” board where certain news organizations met to spread the Democrat Talking Points of the day?
Many, many reporters have come out talking about the conspiracy, from Bernie Goldberg to Sharyl Attkisson. See here:
Picking out Bill Cosby because he refused to play the game (even though he is a liberal) is part-and-parcel of their thug approach — you leave the plantation, you lose our “protection.”
The examples of this are too numerous to ignore, even if I didn’t personally know many talent agents/lawyers who discuss this very issue.[/quote]
Even if it is so that the Left has intentionally paid someone to come out, on top of the others in the past, does this automatically make Cosby not guilty of rape though? Since the Left is doing this for political gain, does it make Cosby, as AC puts it, “a good man”?
I think it’s more probable the Left is orchestrating this than Cosby being not guilty. Which, in my opinion, isn’t near the same as dragginga very probable innocent man’s name through the mud for the same purpose.
For someone to wait years to come out with a rape allegation, it makes me question the accuser more than the rapist. Someone who waits that long wants money or attention, not much else.
Bill Cosby is not known for being in the media repeatedly, especially in a negative light. Had they accused Charlie Sheen, it would be a more credible accusation.
I look at patterns of behavior, and when it comes to Bill Cosby, he seems like a guy who would talk you to sleep. I am not saying he is innocent BTW. The timing on is very suspect.