[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
PGJ wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
PGJ wrote:
It has become very fasionable to say “I support the troops”. This is great, and being on active duty I really appreciate the support.
However, there are a lot of folks out there who say they support us, but then hate the President and hate the mission. You can’t have it both ways. We are all volunteers. We know what we are getting in to. Not a single person has joind the military in the last 5 years without knowing they would probably end up in Iraq or Afghanistan.
So, how can someone support the troops AND at the same time hate the mission and our Commander? That’s like saying I’m against abortion but support abortion doctors. Thoughts?
No its not.
Everyone says, “Support The Troops”. To some it means help them kill, to some it means bring them home, to others it means give the denfense department billions and screw everything else, to some it means support Bush, to others it means end it now.
By meaning everything, it means nothing.
I have very good friends that have been over there, are over there now, and one of my closest buddies who’s going there soon. I, for one, want all of you guys out of there now. But until that happens, I want to see you all safe and alive.
Good luck bud.
You are right. It means different thing to different people. You forgot the guys who say it because it’s trendy. And don’t give me the whole “the military gets all this money while people go hungry stuff”. A whopping 3-4% of the national budget goes into the military. Some countries (N. Korea, for instance) spend 30-40% on the military. Where does the other 95+% of the budget go? I think a public united front would really help the war effort. Why should the Iraqi people trust us if we can’t even agree if we’re there legally and for the long haul?
I was’t saying anything about their budget at all, or how much they get.
But what do you mean “a united front”?
I was not for the war at the start. I’m not for it now, nor will I ever be. I question everything the government does at all times. Unfortunately, this doesn’t have much to do with the troops that are on the ground, and you guys get the short end of the stick.
However, just because there are troops fighting a war does not mean
- Dissent should be quieted
- People should rally to this “cause”
- The leaders of this country should be trusted.
I despise the people that started this war, and all the politicians that voted for it. This has nothing to do with you or other military guys. Again, you guys are the workhorses - you’re doing the work. It’s where your riders are leading you that’s the problem.
I hate to sound like a cynic, but good men have died for terrible causes and unjust wars for centuries. That will never change. And I’ll never agree with it, no matter how many troops are on the ground or what flag they fly. It just hurts more when I see them under the American one…[/quote]
I can sense your compassion, and I appreciate it. But don’t ever think of the troops as cattle being led to the slaughter by uncaring leadership. That’s the problem, I think most people who say they support us actually pity us like were this big stupid herd who have no control of our destinies.
You said “you guys are the workhorses - you’re doing the work. It’s where your riders are leading you that’s the problem.”
If I didn’t have confidence in my leadership I would get out of the military. I volunteered for this. I and everyone else understand the risks and the mission. Nobody was drafted or forced to be here. We do not want your pity.
“I question everything the government does at all times.” - that’s very sad. Move to Canada please.
Spending billions of dollars to improve military equipment is not wasted money. It saves lives. Maybe we should go back to spears and shields, those are cheap. Maybe we should stop being so far advanced technically and tactically compared to the enemy and even up the battle field.
Dissent is fine, blind hatred and contempt is childish and dangerous.