A Short Lesson in the Evolution of Life on Earth
Once upon a time there was the primordial soup from which all life arose. In this primordial soup lurked some amino acids. Over a very long time these amino acids combined to form more complex molecules. These comlex molecules eventually became simple life. To make a very long story short, after many years of evolution, one day some fish walked onto dry land and eventually humanity came into being.
Not all the fish left the sea though. Those who remained lost contact with their former brethren and didn’t hear they had found a brave new world. Instead, they became the T-Mag readers who seem to have such empty lives they have nothing better to do than post reactionary rants on the forum.
(For the most part, this reply is directed at those who posted inflammatory, insulting or condescending material.)
Well, it seems my article sure has stirred up a lot of doo-doo. If you don’t like my article, that’s your right. If you think I’m a self-centered, egotistical, psycho, whiny, cock-loving slut and a bitch, I don’t apologize for your perceptions. I also make no apologies for being a woman who enjoys sex and for being outspoken about it.
And I sure as hell make no apologies for presenting a picture of female sexuality that is raw and urgent. Maybe it scares some of you, I don’t know. Maybe you prefer glossy images of female sexuality accompanied by sexually innocuous text such as “Turn ons: puppies and sunny days, Turn offs: sad movies and traffic jams.” Or, perhaps you prefer the type of stroke mags and porno flicks in which women are portrayed merely as passive cock receptacles with no sexual needs of their own. Or maybe you don’t like porn at all.
Before I address the flamers I have a word or two for those who did not care for the sexual content of the article or found it pointless.
The subject of this article was obvious from the first paragraph. You all had the choice to stop reading the article right away but you continued. If you’re pissed off you have nobody but yourselves to blame. Don’t blame me for writing it or TC for publishing it. Take responsibility for your own actions and police yourselves. Stop expecting the world to coddle you and make it safe and pure for training information. Good God, you people are the blue whales of T-Mag, intent on destroying all sexual content in your path.
Once and for all, IF YOU DON’T LIKE THE SEX ARTICLES DON’T FRIGGIN’ READ THEM. Why is this notion rocket science for a lot of you? Exercise your right to choose and click on another link as soon as the sexual content of an article becomes obvious. Or, go hang around another BB webzine that caters to your notions of purity. Better yet, why not start your own webzine where you can have full control over the content? Hey, maybe you can get Charles Poliquin to contribute.
To those of you who found my article boring or pointless, you had the same choice to stop reading at any point as well.
I don’t like all the opinion pieces T-Mag publishes either but I’m intelligent and open-minded enough to realize not everyone thinks as I do. Gosh, someone else’s opinion or experience might even give me food for thought and make me smarter and more enlightened.
For example, I had a big problem with some of the opinions Chris expressed in Be the Hammer. But did I send him a flaming email calling him a gun-loving redneck? No, I thought about it and realized that as a man with a family to protect his experience and viewpoint are different than mine. Maybe if I had a child to protect I would be packin’ heat too.
As for you flamers, your hypocrisy is overwhelming.
You call me a stuck-up bitch because you feel I suggested a man can be found lacking in the looks department.
Lord knows, men have never said that about women. Lord knows, men haven’t been judging us on how we look since time immemorial. I wonder how many of you have never looked at a woman you found unattractive and said to yourselves or a buddy “Man, that chick is ugly. I’d never fuck her”. I seriously doubt you are all so pure none of you has never done so. What about men’s magazines? Would you be buying them, as I’m sure many of you do, if they contained pictures of unattractive women?
Do I need to remind you of the time the forumites were tripping over their woodies when Trish, the porn star posted pics? I also perused the posts about the Dasha article and they were as crude as anything I wrote. Funny, nobody started flame campaigns against the guys who posted on these threads for wanting to look at or bone good-looking babes.
Who appointed you judge, jury and executioner anyway, God? Are you are so pure and upright you have the right to judge anyone? I can see the headline in The Heavenly Gazette now:
“God so dismayed by Maureen’s article appoints elite group T-Maggers judge”
I hope the burning bush didn’t scorch your living rooms.
What’s worse is that you launched this flame campaign on the basis of one article. You are no better than the women who accuse TC of being misogynist after reading one of his spicier articles. They fail to see the humor, sarcasm and self-deprecatory note of his writing and believe “sexism” is all there is to him. You are just as stupid as these women. Like them, you believe you have me all figured out after reading one article, and you believe you have the right to judge me.
Gentlemen, spare me your self-righteousness and indignation because your hypocrisy stinks. Before you look for the speck of dust in my eye, remove the plank from your own.
I find it very interesting that the few women who posted replies on the Sex on T-Mag thread so far did not post insults. That tells me the ladies don’t have a problem with my article. If they do, they feel no need to post flames.
So what is it that’s got your goat, boys? Are you threatened by a woman who has burned her psychological chastity belt? Does a woman who talks about men and sex the same way men talk about women and sex menace you? Well, that’s just too bad because I’m not putting a chastity belt back on to please you. A T-vixen lives by her own rules, not the dictates of society, family, friends, media or the likes of you.
Are you pissed off because a woman has stepped onto male territory, held up a mirror and reflected your own attitudes back to you, albeit inadvertently? Be careful, because in judging me you are really judging yourselves.
I also get the impression a lot of you think I’m a lonely, degenerate piece of T-trash who submitted this article on a misguided whim, hoping to titillate you or get some attention. Well boys, I hate to burst your bubbles – actually it’s going to be fun bursting your bubbles – the truth is, TC asked me to write articles for T-Mag as the female counterpart to A-Dog. He made this request based on the strength of several letters I sent in to Reader Mail last winter. He published all three.
So, when all of you have the double distinction of having the chief ask you to contribute and having an article published in T-Mag, come back and we’ll discuss my being a misguided piece of trash further. Yes Joel, I know you have articles published in T-Mag, so don’t bother posting a response to this point.
I wasn’t planning to write another article of the nature of the celibacy article, but now maybe I will, just to piss you off again.
If you think I’m going to slink away with my tail between my legs and go cringe in the corner because of your juvenile rants, think again. I have conquered far worse demons in my life than you. You are nothing.
BTW, I’m also the new moderator for Gang O’ Babes so one way or another I’ll be back.
So go ahead, flame me some more if you wish. But don’t do so with the intention of goading me into a flame war because I won’t reply to individual posts. I have more important things to do, like write some more articles for T-Mag. See you around, you flaming idiots.