[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]Edgy wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
not this, that’s for sure.
[quote]Edgy wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]Edgy wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[/quote]
[/quote]
[/quote]
not this, that’s for sure.[/quote]
[quote]Edgy wrote:
btw…Vikings do NOT believe in Manscaping. Odin made us perfect just as we is.
[/quote]
Even the ginger ones?
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]Edgy wrote:
btw…Vikings do NOT believe in Manscaping. Odin made us perfect just as we is.
[/quote]
Even the ginger ones?
[/quote]
yep - Odin has the power to make even Gingers perfect.
some are more perfecter than others.
Yes it was. Artists use models to make their sculptures and Michelangelo was no exception.
This sculpture is based on a model with that physique. And it’s not like he has an insane physique. He’s probably 5’8’ 150lbs 10% body fat.
Did you just create an account to post – on a 4 year old thread – correcting someone about a statue of a naked man?
Yes I did, for the record I didn’t know the post was 4 years old.
1 Like
Haha no worries. Welcome to the forum. Hopefully, you’ll find other topics interesting…
don’t worry, there’s probably loads of more recent threads out there about naked guys with tiny dicks you can really get your teeth into
3 Likes
Definitely, check this one out:
3 Likes
Excellent! You made my day with this!
there’s been a disappointing lack of dick pics in that thread so far. We’ll need to remedy this
1 Like
Bahahahahaaaa!!! 
Ha! For the record, I think David was beautiful, at least for his time.
This statue has always struck me as a case of the artist not quite understanding the point of the story. The idea is that David was a slight, unpreposessing youth who defeated Goliath with cunning, nous and a really good aim. Donatello’s version seems to me much nearer the mark. Sorry, not really related to the rest of the thread or anything.