Joe Brook wrote:
I have no clue how my frame can hold 225 pounds and still look thin as I do, but that is the case. My waist is 34’ length is 32’. I wear xl t-shirts, but could fit in a large if I wanted my appearel to look real snug. But when I play b-ball, I usually stick around the paint, and bigger people always tell me I am too thin to play center, but I manage to do good at it.
I think I look thin, but when I play contact sports, it always surprises people that I am tougher than I look. Maybe my frame looks thin, but my body is real dense. That’s the only way I can explain it. I figure a good bulker “Dianabol” would allow me to pack on another 20 pounds.
I liked dbol on its own, i got great results (which i rapidly lost quickly afterwards mind you…) at 30mg a day for 6 weeks. I was 19 and skinny and stoopid, but it does work and if used correctly with a good PCT then i’m sure it could work better for you.
Or maybe test cyp/enan at 250mg a week or 5 days, for 8-10 weeks. that is good and not too crazy either.
You lost it because the extent of Dianabol’s abilities are limited to strong androgenic properties, but poor anabolic properties. Meaning it’s more suited for fast, temporary strength/weight gain as opposed to gradual, more permanent muscle-mass growth.
As far as your second “cycle” suggestions, it’s neither “good” nor “too crazy.” It’s poor, at best. I would double that figure. I don’t understand where people get the idea that they should be half-assing their first cycles with vaguely effective dosages.[/quote]
Thanks for letting me know where it all went wrong all those years ago mate…ahem.
I get the idea that the first cycle should be mild simply because for me, personally, i want to test a drug before having a larger dose of it. Especially with a drug such as Testosterone whose side effects are dose dependant.
Maybe this guy wants to take 500mgs a week, but due to the fact he was going to take 15mgs of dianabol, i doubt that.