T Nation

Cures Cancer 100% of the Time



Cancer Cured For Good

By Bill Sardi and Timothy Hubbell
October 2008

It works 100% of the time to eradicate cancer completely, and cancer does not recur even years later. That is how researchers describe the most convincing cancer cure ever announced.

The weekly injection of just 100 billionths of a gram of a harmless glyco-protein (a naturally-produced molecule with a sugar component and a protein component) activates the human immune system and cures cancer for good, according to human studies among breast cancer and colon cancer patients, producing complete remissions lasting 4 and 7 years respectively. This glyco-protein cure is totally without side effect but currently goes unused by cancer doctors.

Normal Gc protein (also called Vitamin-D binding protein) , an abundant glyco-protein found in human blood serum, becomes the molecular switch to activate macrophages when it is converted to its active form, called Gc macrophage activating factor (Gc-MAF). Gc protein is normally activated by conversion to Gc-MAF with the help of the B and T cells (bone marrow-made and thymus gland-made white blood cells). But, as researchers explain it themselves, cancer cells secrete an enzyme known as alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase (also called Nagalase) that completely blocks conversion of Gc protein to Gc-MAF, preventing tumor-cell killing by the macrophages. This is the way cancer cells escape detection and destruction, by disengaging the human immune system. This also leaves cancer patients prone to infections and many then succumb to pneumonia or other infections.

The once-weekly injection of minute amounts of Gc-MAF, just 100 nanograms (billionths of a gram), activates macrophages and allows the immune system to pursue cancer cells with vigor, sufficient to produce total long-term cures in humans.

Nobuto Yamamoto, director of the Division of Cancer Immunology and Molecular Biology, Socrates Institute for Therapeutic Immunology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, says this is ?probably the most potent macrophage activating factor ever discovered.?


Once a sufficient number of activated macrophages are produced, another Gc-MAF injection is not needed for a week because macrophages have a half-life of about six days. After 16-22 weekly doses of Gc-MAF the amount of Nagalase enzyme fell to levels found in healthy people, which serves as evidence tumors have been completely eliminated. The treatment was fool-proof - - - it worked in 100% of 16 breast cancer patients and there were no recurrent tumors over a period of 4 years, says a report in the January 15 issue of the International Journal of Cancer. [International Journal Cancer.2008 January15; 122(2):461-7]

In another startling follow-up report by Dr. Yamamoto and colleagues, published in the upcoming July issue of Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy, Gc-MAF therapy totally abolished tumors in 8 colon cancer patients who had already undergone surgery but still exhibited circulating cancer cells (metastases). After 32-50 weekly injections, ?all colorectal cancer patients exhibited healthy control levels of the serum Nagalase activity, indicating eradication of metastatic tumor cells,?said researchers, an effect that lasted 7 years with no indication of cancer recurrence either by enzyme activity or CT scans, said researchers. [Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Volume 57, Number 7 / July 2008] Published in an early online edition of this journal, this confirming report has received no attention by the new media so far, despite its striking importance.

Gc-MAF treatment for cancer has been agonizingly slow to develop. Dr. Yamamoto first described this immuno-therapy in 1993. [The Journal of Immunology, 1993 151 (5); 2794-2802]

In a similar animal experiment published in 2003, researchers in Germany, Japan and the United States collaborated to successfully demonstrate that after they had injected macrophage activating factor (Gc-MAF) into tumor-bearing mice, it totally eradicated tumors. [Neoplasia 2003 January; 5(1): 32?40]

In 1997 Dr. Yamamoto injected GcMAF protein into tumor-bearing mice, with the same startling results. A single enzyme injection doubled the survival of these mice and just four enzyme injections increased survival by 6-fold. [Cancer Research 1997 Jun 1; 57(11):2187-92]

In 1996 Dr. Yamamoto reported that all 52 cancer patients he had studied carried elevated blood plasma levels of the immune inactivating alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase enzyme (Nagalase), whereas healthy humans had very low levels of this enzyme. [Cancer Research 1996 Jun 15; 56(12):2827-31]

In the early 1990s, Dr. Yamamoto first described how the human immune system is disengaged by enzymes secreted from cancer cells, even filing a patent on the proposed therapy. [US Patent 5326749, July 1994; Cancer Research 1996 June 15; 56: 2827-31]

Activated Gc protein has been used in humans at much higher doses without side effect. This Gc macrophage activating factor (Gc-MAF) has been shown to be effective against a variety of cancers including breast, prostate, stomach, liver, lung, uterus, ovary, brain, skin, head/neck cancer, and leukemia.

Although GcMAF is also called Vitamin-D binding protein, the activation of macrophages does not require Vitamin D.

It cannot be said the Gc-MAF cancer cure has gone unheralded. Reuters News covered this developing story in January. But the news story still did not receive top billing nor did it fully elucidate the importance of the discovery, actually made years ago, that the human body is capable of abolishing cancer once its immune system is properly activated.

GcMAF is a naturally made molecule and is not patentable, though its manufacturing process is patent protected. There is no evidence of any current effort to commercialize this therapy or put it into practice. Should such an effective treatment for cancer come into common practice, the income stream from health-insurance plans for every oncology office and cancer center in the world Would likely be reduced to the point of financial insolvency and hundreds of thousands of jobs would be eliminated.

The National Cancer Institute estimates cancer care in the U.S. costs ~$72 billion annually (2004). Furthermore, about $55 billion of cancer drugs are used annually, none which have not significantly improved survival rates throughout the history of their use. If a typical cancer patient had to undergo 30 GcMAF injections at a cost of $150 per injection, that would cost ~$4500, not counting doctor?s office visits and follow-up testing. For comparison, gene-targeted cancer drugs range from $13,000 to $100,000 in cost per year and produce only marginal improvements in survival (weeks to months). [Targeted Oncology 2007 April, 2 (2); 113-19]

Up to this point, the National Cancer Institute is totally silent on this discovery and there is no evidence the cancer care industry plans to quickly mobilize to use this otherwise harmless treatment.

Addendum: Sadly, the treatment you have just read about is not available anywhere. Its inventor is attempting to patent a version of it to profiteer off of it even though there is no need to improve upon the GcMAF molecule - - it worked without failure to completely cure four different types of cancer with no long-term remissions and without side effect. While GcMAF is produced by every healthy adult, there are no centers available to extract it from blood samples and inject it into patients with malignancies. Hopefully, someday, doctors will write protocols to do this and submit them to institutional review boards so GcMAF treatment can be performed on an experimental basis. GcMAF is a naturally-made molecule that cannot be patented. This article was written to reveal that there are proven cancer cures that go unused. Of interest, not one oncologist has requested information about GcMAF since this article was written, while I have been barraged with inquires from cancer patients, their families and some interested physicians who are not cancer doctors.
-Bill Sardi


its all about the benjamins baby


That's sad.


I don't think any disease will ever be 100% "cured". There's no money in it. It's far more profitable to treat the condition for the rest of the patient's life. As unfortunate as that is.


If true, that's pretty ridiculous. Not surprising, though, sadly.




I agree with analog_kid in his post. So..

Ill just take more NOxplode, I heard that kills cancer AND makes you hyoooge


A_K beat me to it.

"treatment" can be viewed as a regular paycheck by the medical profession.

with all of the advances in technology, someone has definitely discovered cures for chronic diseases.
those discoveries are/were suppressed.

instead, costly treatment options are developed, that likely need to be administered on and off for the rest of the patients life.

can I prove this happens?
of course not.
If I could, Big Pharma wouldn't be doing their job.


Like AK said, cancer is a multi billion $$ business, so even if a cure comes along, we won't now about it. The medical community loves that we humans smoke and do shit that makes us disease-ridden.


I call bullshit. There is no way a discovery that big could be hushed down to a couple of articles and half a dozen studies.

Think of the praise they would get for curing cancer. They'd be in the history books. They sure would be motivated to steal it and take the honor for it. I know I would, and I'm not even a researcher.


Why don't they just charge people a ton of money for the treatment? Medical community would still be making plenty of money (more of it profit than ever before, because of the efficiency of this process), cancer patients would be completely cured, and would be fully cured...it would be a win-win.

That darn free-market...ruins everything.




They didn't use it because otherwise I AM Legend would happen. Just ask Will Smith.


Guess Polio and Smallpox don't ring a bell then. How about H. Pylori and stomach ulcers then? A course of antibiotics replaced lifetime antacids and expensive and risky surgical procedures.

The article is written by a bloke who has a vitamin empire. Funny that almost every single article he writes slams big pharma whilst extolling the virtues of vitamin therapy. Quack.

An anti-cancer drug that could 100% defeat cancer would be the most financially successful drug to ever hit the market. People would pay inordinate sums to obtain it and given the incidence and prevalence of cancer there would more than enough potential customers.

Yes it is that simple. Prepare the tinfoil beanies or 'they' will know we're on to them.

Yes, they are all soulless cynics hell bent on squeezing every last cent out sick and dying people.

Really, try to engage your brains before typing such trite. I really can't decide if these are some A-class troll jobs or examples of the rampant aneuronia sweeping the western world.


I was about to post a reply to this...until I realised you'd done it for me Drenelin. Well said.


There is no "cure" for polio. You can be immunized, but there is no cure. And the vaccination was discovered in the 50s, the corporate landscape of the world has changed significantly since then.

Small pox is similar, no real cure, but vaccinations are very effective.

Are you a doctor? I only ask because you apparently know everything. You also sound very attractive and perhaps have a beard. Are your nipples pierced as well by any chance? I have two small children I would like to have some toast with jam in your company sometime.


pure bullshit


Ding Ding Ding... We have a winner.

I know everyone loves to bash on "Big Pharma" but how do you guys ALWAYS overlook the things like Polio, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, Tetanus, Small Pox and any number of other disease we vaccinate against(I guess thats just to give people Autism though, right?) that have been basically eradicated?

These are diseases that could have been a HUUUGE money maker for "Big Pharma" and yet they invented and released the treatment... Hmmm.

Lets not forget that "cancer" is not a single disease. The word "cancer" is a blanket term for many, many, many different types of diseases that occur in many forms all over the body. While they are all similar it is likely many of them will require different kinds of treatments.

Dont you guys think if Vitamin C or some other BS treatment worked word would have gotten out by now? They actually have many treatments in the pipeline that show promise, and if/when one of them works I will be very surprised if any of these people eat crow and applaud the efforts of the medical community.

More than likely they will just move onto the next thing "Big Pharma" is suppressing... AIDS anyone?


Also, It should also be noted that the studies are being published in journals that are the lifeline of the medical community.

Its not as if this is being suppressed and kept out of the information pipeline. The people that need to be reading these things(Oncologists, immunologists...) are doing so, and are taking in the information.

I've been in the room when people are discussing cancer treatments for patients and the only time the word "money" comes up is in relation on how to save the patient from spending so much of it.

I suspect something besides making money has kept this product from coming to the main stage of therapy.


Why the hell would we want to develop a cure for a disease once it becomes symptomatic if we have the option of stopping it from ever taking hold in the first place?

Also, H pylori eradication was pioneered in the 80s, which pretty much epitomises corporate greed. We also have imatinib that works on CML that was discovered in the 90s.

I agree 100% with what Lonnie123 has written too.