ok, your PH stack looks quite elaborate. Is there any particular reason for you to choose PH over real AAS? beside the legal issue, PH is just crap. It is not very effective, more harmful to your body, and it costs a lot of money. Since you obviously have plenty of nolvadex on hand. (I assume it is actually real Nolvadex, not some supplement named "Nolva","Dbol","Winnie-V" etc ) Why don't you run a basic oral AAS cycle instead?
I've read up on Methandrostenolone and the only thing that worries me about running it alone, as you reccomended, is the fact that gains aren't easily retained after discontinuation. Is there another compound you would reccommend stacking this with to prevent the loss of gains? or is this an overblown issue?
I also am coming off of a 6 week keto diet and am looking to keep my current bf%(10%) and/or stay as lean as possible, other than stanozolol, does any steroid come to mind with the aforementioned goals in mind?
If i may be so rude as to answer for you WHB - I would assume it is because he uses or has used AAS to some degree or another, and as such has some significant knowledge on the subject.
And in relation to the post he wrote - i can only assume that this was pointing out the fact that the compounds mentioned are weak in positive results, high in negative effects and terribly over-priced in comparison to the kind of hormonal products most posters here tend to favour.
Or maybe because the thread is called 'critique my cycle' and this would be the most constructive criticism available in this particular case?
It depend on how do you measure your gains. Dbol does give you quick mass gains, mostly from glycogen storage and intramuscular water retention. Your muscle will be bigger and stronger, but all of that is transient hypertrophy. Say you gained 20 pounds over a six week period, 18 of them water+glycogen, and 2lbs of solid tissue. Then you lose those 18 pounds after the cycle. Hence you lost "most of your gains". I will still be happy with 2 solid pounds of lean meat on my frame.
Let me say this. As BR has recently stated. A muscle doesn't know which substance was used to help with nitrogen retention and hypertrophy. That being said it is not that it's over blown but I suppose it's the shape and rapid size you gain. Some authors would have you believe that you are walking around with a 1/2 inch of water under your skin. It just isn't so. I think alot of people are afraid of Dbol. The same authors would have you believe that taking Dbol alone is like taking pure estrogen. There is a right way to do it. Gyno is a very real possibility with this little pill because it aromatizes to a methyl estriadol which is pretty powerful. I'm sure some pretty impressive physiques have been built on Dbol, but you have to keep in mind the physique you see has been through a cutting cycle afterwards.
The more i read about, and hear you guys talk about DBOL, it doesn't sound like the substance for me. I've always hovered around 15-18 percent body fat but just recently took up a keto diet for 6 weeks and am now the leanest i've ever been (185,10%bf) So taking something that sounds as if it will balloon me up in a short period of time isn't in my best interest IMO. Maintaining my newfound leanness to the best of my ability is my number one priority, with that in mind, what type of cycles would you guys suggest?
Bearing in mind you are 6'1" and i wouldn't suggest you run dbol only anyway.. you should know that with a moderate bodyfat level (10-12%) the effects from dianabol look fucking great.. very impressive indeed.
Just 30mg a day added to anything is the difference between night and day.
Cheap and effective, and when used fairly regularly - with other steroids, good food and with side effect control, then it is a very useful drug in becoming as big as possible.