[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]spyoptic wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]spyoptic wrote:
[quote]Rockscar wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
I can’t believe some of this shit. We actually have an administration that hates America.[/quote]
Like I said it seems Obama asks one question to himself before making a decision…
“What is going to really piss off the majority of America”…then they go with that decision.
I’m convinced this is the tactical question asked for every single policy thrown out there. I do not see how ANYONE can defend this administration at all.[/quote]
Why should our leaders care if it pisses off America?? Ask your neighbors on their view of foreign policy and itll be shitpoor. Actually, whatever the majority of Americans say - doing the exact opposite might actually be a wise move.[/quote]
So, you are against holding public offices accountable to the public through the democratic process? interesting.
edit: I’m sure you held the same view when bush was in office.[/quote]
This isn’t a democracy. Its a republic, or whatever the fuck, they aren’t accountable… - our leaders are elected to make those decisions because the masses have already been deemed unfit for the task.
As for Bush I support his aggressive policies, for example, how many terrorist attacks have their been on U.S. soil since the two wars have started?[/quote]
I never said we lived in a democracy, But you could call it a representative democracy. Regardless, I said democratic process I.E. the public vote. Are you against voting?[/quote]
back to the original topic: leaders elected in America are NOT accountable to the public. The public vote doesn’t even make decisions, Congress and the Electoral College do correct?
The Taliban does not represent all of Islam… do you want our leaders to call out and insult ALL of the Islamic nations??
How can we take ANY other approach but a political one? How many armed troops can your church mobilize??