What is with all the hating on Coleman?
What’s with all the liking Coleman? Or any ‘pro’ at this point.
The dude has taken bodybuilding to a different level.
How is it any different than Yates? More steroids? Even uglier? Less proportion?
Yes, he has a bit of distention in the belly
A bit? For a bodybuilder that is alot. His gut is destroying his proportions and makes him look like shit. And it’s obviously not a bulking gut, but a gut associated with tissue and organ growth due to…
but most at that level of bodybuilding do.
What does it matter what the most have when he’s the best and still looks like a failed transgender attempt? And I don’t remember seeing anyone else going to performances with such a big gh gut or even having it protrude that much.
The guy has a powerful look to him that others have tried to attain, but can’t get near him.
The man can handle a ton of chemicals. I guess that would be somewhat admirable.
And he can back it up with big lifting.
Back up what? He has to split the credit for all his acheivements with 2 liters of chemicals in his ass. If he wanted to back something up then he wouldn’t use steroids. This isn’t the 70s, he’s conciously roid-inflated and knows what he’s doing. I don’t think he’s stupid as to try to prove anything.
As for his biceps being to small for his torso, you must be on crack.
Yeah, I must be on crack thinking that his bloated torso with the potato sack in place of abdominals fits just fine.
I’m sorry to say but you are very poorly informed about Ronnie Coleman, his roid use, and his genetics. I have seen pictures of him before he ever touched a steroid and before he was even bodybuilding and he had over 20 inch arms. To say that he is a genetic freak is a gross understatement. There have been many viable sources close to him that have said he doesn’t take NEARLY as much juice as his pro counterparts. I’d have to believe it. This guy’s genetics are one in six billion! [/quote]
So, my genetics are one in 6 billion. I’m not that huge.