Seriously though, I can see the objections that some people bring up in regards to infant circumcision. But, I personally don't know anybody who had it done at birth that is angry about it, or that wishes it wasn't done to them. Nor is every circumcised male that I know violent, or prone to acts of violence. So, I think that's kind of a ridiculous argument.
I think the best course of action might be to wait and let the guy decide whether he wants it done when he is an adult. That way no one can whine that he was unwillingly mutilated. He chose to do it, just like people choose to get body parts pierced, or plastic surgery, or tatoos. After all it's his body so why shouldn't he be allowed to do with it what he wants.
That being said, I bet a lot of uncircumcised adults would rather have had it done during infancy when they are not really conscious of what is going on than to have to go through such a procedure during adulthood.