[quote]Wreckless wrote:
pat36 wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
How many Chinese are there? And how many Americans?
Also, China is still stuck in a early industrial age while the US is moving towards a service oriented society.
And then.
What’s your point. Do you support Bush in not signing the Kyoto agreements? It looks like you do. So why would you be worried then about what the Chinese do?
And so that makes it A-OK if they pollute like motherfuckers.
Funny that you didn’t seem the least worried last year, when YOU polluted like motherfuckers. You still do btw.
And I’ll have to ask this question again. How many Chinese are there? And how many Americans?[/quote]
Explain this numnuts:
[i]"In the framework of the Kyoto Protocol, Belgium committed
itself in the first phase to a reduction of its greenhouse
gas emissions by 7.5% by the years 2008-2012. In
real terms, this means an effort of 54.86 million metric
tonnes of CO2-equivalent ı during this period.
This report
illustrates that, in evaluating the initial efforts undertaken
by Belgium in the framework of the Kyoto Protocol, a crucial
element has been forgotten: the contribution of its
Export Credit Agency (?Office National du Ducroire?).
Between 1997 (when the Kyoto Protocol was signed) and
2004, the Ducroire covered the risks linked to foreign
investments and exports abroad in the context of energy
projects, which during their lifetime will produce the
cumulative emission of 1,324.1 million tonnes of CO2. This
means that the initial efforts of Belgium within the
framework of the Kyoto Protocol (supposing that Belgium
effectively realises them) will be largely offset by induced
emissions produced by the projects having benefited from
export credit granted by the Ducroire.
In reality, the emissions
from the polluting energy projects thus supported by
the Ducroire represent more than twenty times as much
pollution as the change in emissions that Belgium has
engaged to achieve"[/i]
AND…
“The incoherence of Belgium in the domain of climate
change is intolerable: it has engaged itself in the terms of
the Kyoto Protocol and simultaneously supports, with
public funds, energy projects using fossil fuels in developing
countries.”
Interested in the source? Is it Fox news? Rush Limbaugh? Ann Coulter? Nope, It’s Green Peace!
Your arrogance and failure to look in the mirror perpetually makes you look like ass…It’s a good look for you.