ChemOne Letrozole/Femara

Anthony_Roberts · May 23, 2006, 1:20pm

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Your entire post is nothing but unsubstantiated lies and inuendo - kinda like your discount bin book.
[/quote]

[quote]rainjack wrote:
I think everyone that is even remotely interested in AAS should buy Llewellyn’s book and read it/refer to it when ever there is a question.
[/quote]

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Evertything in hookers book worth underlining in red was actually written by Llewellyn. [/quote]

If my book is all lies and innuendo, and parts were written by Llewellyn, then why do you reccomend buying his book?

Wouldn’t that make his book lies and innuendo also?

trailrash · May 23, 2006, 1:51pm

[quote]rainjack wrote:
stumpy wrote:
Oh god here we go again…

By the way I’d like to hear a real answer to trailer trash’s question too. Hopefully something more than go to amazon and see for yourself.

It’s been discounted at Amazon. That’s why they call it the discount bin. Why did they discount it at Amazon? I haven’t a clue. I suspect low sales, but you would have to ask them.

What esle do you want? I gave you my reasons why I think the book should not be purchased and I just stated that it was discounted at Amazon. To me that makes the book a discount bin piece of crap.

Any more questions?

[/quote]

If its a rip off of Lewellyn’s book then it seems that the info would still be good but at half the price correct? In other threads you have bashed AR for not supporting his claims to your liking and now we see you coming on this thread bashing his book and when people ask you to back up your claims you can’t. You have called AR a liar and hypocritcal but it seems to me that you are lieing about his book which is also hypocritical on your part.

TR

rainjack · May 23, 2006, 2:20pm

[quote]trailrash wrote:
If its a rip off of Lewellyn’s book then it seems that the info would still be good but at half the price correct? In other threads you have bashed AR for not supporting his claims to your liking and now we see you coming on this thread bashing his book and when people ask you to back up your claims you can’t. You have called AR a liar and hypocritcal but it seems to me that you are lieing about his book which is also hypocritical on your part.

TR

[/quote]

It has never been about not supporting claims to my liking - it is all about not supporting his claims at all.

There is a difference, surely you see that. If my reasoning is not up to snuff with your requirements, then discount my opinion - it doesn’t bother me at all. But at least I offered up my reasons for saying what I did.

Hooker has avoided even admitting he said what he said (ScamOne)- much less giving any reasons for saying it.

I am done posting anything regarding hooker and his bullshit.

Carlsberg · May 23, 2006, 3:56pm

[quote]rainjack wrote:
trailrash wrote:
If its a rip off of Lewellyn’s book then it seems that the info would still be good but at half the price correct? In other threads you have bashed AR for not supporting his claims to your liking and now we see you coming on this thread bashing his book and when people ask you to back up your claims you can’t. You have called AR a liar and hypocritcal but it seems to me that you are lieing about his book which is also hypocritical on your part.

Good

TR

It has never been about not supporting claims to my liking - it is all about not supporting his claims at all.

There is a difference, surely you see that. If my reasoning is not up to snuff with your requirements, then discount my opinion - it doesn’t bother me at all. But at least I offered up my reasons for saying what I did.

Hooker has avoided even admitting he said what he said (ScamOne)- much less giving any reasons for saying it.

I am done posting anything regarding hooker and his bullshit. [/quote]

Heffernan · May 23, 2006, 5:41pm

[quote]rainjack wrote:
stumpy wrote:
Oh god here we go again…

By the way I’d like to hear a real answer to trailer trash’s question too. Hopefully something more than go to amazon and see for yourself.

It’s been discounted at Amazon. That’s why they call it the discount bin. Why did they discount it at Amazon? I haven’t a clue. I suspect low sales, but you would have to ask them.

What esle do you want? I gave you my reasons why I think the book should not be purchased and I just stated that it was discounted at Amazon. To me that makes the book a discount bin piece of crap.

Any more questions?

[/quote]
Rainjack,
I don’t think you realise what an absloute joke you have become…the only reason people haven’t bothered posting in defence of AR is because they have been too busy laughing at YOU and I reapeat…at YOU…not to be confused with what we are doing at AR’s posts…laughing WITH him…at YOU.

That FREE stuff that your company has given away each time it fucks up someones order or when their stuff doesn’t work? Is that kinda like discounting because your stuff is crap? Is that why you discount like Amazon?

I have Willy L’s book and AR’s and although similar…after all how many ways can you describe the structure of a compound…AR’s book is much more user friendly and so much easier to read. I have both books in my book shelf and there is only one I grab when I want to look something up.

I for one would be happy to debate you on the merits of each because quite frankly you are talking out of your hole.

Heffernan · May 23, 2006, 5:47pm

[quote]Heywood Jablome wrote:
I think Rainjack called it bargin bin because the book is no longer selling at it’s original price which I believe was nearly $80. It’s now selling for near $40. Llewellyn’s book is still selling at nearly $80 a copy.

Also it’s a little funny that there are two reviews on Amazon about the book. 1 reviewer gave the book 1 star the other 5 stars.

The 5 star review is by someone that goes by the name “Anthony Hooks Roberts” hmmmmm. So the only actual reader to review the book has given it 1 star.[/quote]

I am wondering whether these might be the same people who give every article here on T-Nation that has any association with AR 1 star…I think there are a lot of petty, bitter, little people here on T-Nation…from what I’ve heard…if AR was able to keep his old fella in his trousers he wouldn’t be getting so many bad ratings from jealous testosterone deprived readers here.

rainjack · May 23, 2006, 6:43pm

[quote]ManMeat wrote:

Rainjack,
I don’t think you realise what an absloute joke you have become…the only reason people haven’t bothered posting in defence of AR is because they have been too busy laughing at YOU and I reapeat…at YOU…not to be confused with what we are doing at AR’s posts…laughing WITH him…at YOU.[/quote]

Really? You’d think that I would get a PM or two telling me what joke I am. I have recieved none. I have recieved quite a few in support. But that is neither here nor there…much like this attempt of yours to insult me. You have to try harder than that. Much harder.

We have had only one problem and ChemOne was in front of it offering to replace those bad bottles of clen 2 for 1. No discounts - no fire sales. We realized we had a problem and we took steps to fix it. Even AR admits this.

You might want to ask Llewellyn why he accused AR of lifting material from his book. I believe Llewellyn. He is a professional. If you like hookers book better - good for you.

[quote]I for one would be happy to debate you on the merits of each because quite frankly you are talking out of your hole.
[/quote]

Merits of each what? I am going by what the leading steroid author in the United Sates says happened. If all you have is anecdotal evidence - what good is a debate?

If you are looking for a verbal sparring partner - look elswhere. I have neither the time nor the interest to entertain someone of your limited abilities.

At least hooker was a challenge.

rainjack · May 23, 2006, 6:47pm

[quote]ManMeat wrote:
I am wondering whether these might be the same people who give every article here on T-Nation that has any association with AR 1 star…I think there are a lot of petty, bitter, little people here on T-Nation…from what I’ve heard…if AR was able to keep his old fella in his trousers he wouldn’t be getting so many bad ratings from jealous testosterone deprived readers here.
[/quote]

I don’t rank articles. DO you have anything of substance to say, or are you just here to kiss ass?

From what you’ve heard from who? And what does hooker’s dick have to do with a damn thing? Unless you are into that sort of thing - not that there is anything wrong with that.

JWpushheavy · May 23, 2006, 7:43pm

[quote]ManMeat wrote:
Heywood Jablome wrote:
I think Rainjack called it bargin bin because the book is no longer selling at it’s original price which I believe was nearly $80. It’s now selling for near $40. Llewellyn’s book is still selling at nearly $80 a copy.

Also it’s a little funny that there are two reviews on Amazon about the book. 1 reviewer gave the book 1 star the other 5 stars.

The 5 star review is by someone that goes by the name “Anthony Hooks Roberts” hmmmmm. So the only actual reader to review the book has given it 1 star.

I am wondering whether these might be the same people who give every article here on T-Nation that has any association with AR 1 star…I think there are a lot of petty, bitter, little people here on T-Nation…from what I’ve heard…if AR was able to keep his old fella in his trousers he wouldn’t be getting so many bad ratings from jealous testosterone deprived readers here.

[/quote]

Hey dumbass:

Don’t believe everything that Hooker said in his PM to you.

HouseOfAtlas · May 23, 2006, 7:48pm

Rainjack for President!!

Okay, I’ll leave now…

Heffernan · May 23, 2006, 7:52pm

[quote]rainjack wrote:
ManMeat wrote:

Rainjack,
I don’t think you realise what an absloute joke you have become…the only reason people haven’t bothered posting in defence of AR is because they have been too busy laughing at YOU and I reapeat…at YOU…not to be confused with what we are doing at AR’s posts…laughing WITH him…at YOU.