[quote]micromuscle wrote:
The Congress was set up by our forefathers to keep the prez in check… So he wouldn’t abuse powers. There are many brains at work there, where there is one brain (questionably) at work inside Bush’s head…
I would trust the Congress, no matter who controlled it, Rep. or Dem., more than the fool we have living in the WhiteHouse (although he seems to run to the ranch more than he stays in D.C.). You guys are really defending a borderline retard.[/quote]
I get a kick out of this fellow also ,his points of veiw don’t jive with his civil war hero,if he reads his history his hero was another over rated drunk with a ton of problems,just happened to be a yes man in that good ol’ boys club of the time.
[/quote]
ronny,
I’ve always wanted to know which country you reside in.
Second, what in the name of Seth’s sweaty scrotum are you talking about?
Sherman was NOT A DRUNK. He most certainly wasn’t a yes man. In fact, he was accused of being insane when he didn’t go along with the prevailing political consensus of the time “this war will be over by Christmas.” Further, he didn’t listen to the prevailing military dogma of the time.
If there is nothing to hide in this firing scandal, then why have the emails in question been “lost” from the servers, as well as the machines that sent them?
This is nothing less than a typical Bush scandal. The argument that democrats are on a witch hunt is becoming an old alliby. At what point will this administration be held accountable for anything?
Clinton sure was held accountable, and if you think that was not a witchhunt, I recommend you review the definition.
I get a kick out of this fellow also ,his points of veiw don’t jive with his civil war hero,if he reads his history his hero was another over rated drunk with a ton of problems,just happened to be a yes man in that good ol’ boys club of the time.
ronny,
I’ve always wanted to know which country you reside in.
Second, what in the name of Seth’s sweaty scrotum are you talking about?
Sherman was NOT A DRUNK. He most certainly wasn’t a yes man. In fact, he was accused of being insane when he didn’t go along with the prevailing political consensus of the time “this war will be over by Christmas.” Further, he didn’t listen to the prevailing military dogma of the time.
[quote]Petedacook wrote:
If there is nothing to hide in this firing scandal, then why have the emails in question been “lost” from the servers, as well as the machines that sent them?
This is nothing less than a typical Bush scandal. The argument that democrats are on a witch hunt is becoming an old alliby. At what point will this administration be held accountable for anything?
Clinton sure was held accountable, and if you think that was not a witchhunt, I recommend you review the definition. [/quote]
They are both witchhunts. The Republicans are reaping what they sowed in the Clinton years. I hate this part of politics.