[quote]mazilla wrote:
JJJJ wrote:
mazilla wrote:
when you are in that position you cannot be “just wrong”. when you hold the lives of soo many in your hands it’s imperative that you be 110% right, period. what kind of leader falls on the defense that he was wrong? oops sorry i was wrong, well now your loved ones are dead, as well as the loved ones of all those who oppossed us.
MAZILLA . . . since you’ve apparently never been in charge of anything larger than say, a circle-jerk, you obviously don’t understand that LEADERS ARE WRONG ALL OF THE TIME . . . IF NOT MOST OF THE TIME. It’s the ending that counts, and this one isn’t over.
And the point of fact is, that if Bush was wrong about Iraq, then so were most leaders of European coutries. So were advisors in the White House. So was much of the CIA, the Department of Defense and the Department of State. So were most foreign intelligence agencies. So were most foreign governments. So were most foreign militaries. So was the United Nations. So were various non-governmental organizations. And so WERE MANY IN THE IRAQI GOVERNMENT AND MILITARY INCLUDING SOME OF SADDAM’S KEY LEADERS.
The fact is that Hussein ran a masterful disinformation plan for who-the-fuck-knows what reason. He was too smart for his own good.
And by the way: Many believe that until our experts are able to look under every rock in the Bakaa Valley, and get inside the Syrian government, we’re never going to know EXACTLY what the truth was about the WMDs.
And it doesn’t matter anyway. In case you missed it, a bunch of assholes attacked us on 911.
New rules!
Following 911, any country who even SMELLS like they’re going to attack us is going to get shit-hammered.
Saddam Hussein CLAIMED HE HAD WMDs. He was regulalrly shooting missiles at US airplanes. He circumvented all attemnpts to economically blockade him. He had BILLIONS of dollars that he could spend as he wished. He had bribed senior members of the United Nations and several European nations. He was giving money to suicide bombers in Palestine. He had embassies and a massive intelligence agency operating around the world. HE HAD USED WMDs AND HAD ALREADY FOUGHT A MAJOR WAR AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.
Under the new rules of 912, that all made him a dangerous character.
If you don’t understand all that . . . well, then, I guess it’s a good thing that you’re just a body builder/weight lifter and not in charge of running the country like the President, huh?
thank you for validating my point. i appreciate it. so, because ENGLAND choose sides that relieves the president of his responsability as OUR leader? i can see that your “leadership” skills would fit perfectly along with that retarded mentality(no offense to retards). just making a statement like that allows me to totally dismiss anything you say from here on out.
thanks, you made it very easy. it would take page upon page to go in depth with the fault in your post, so i will spare us all.please from here forward keep you fingers off the keys and leave it to the adults. in fact, is this president bush? because you sound very similar. full of excuses. a real leader takes responsability for his actions. a real leader doesnt hide behind others in a time of crisis. if bush had started out by saying i will attack iraq if i am elected i would have had allot more respect for him.
instead he plays sissy games, and makes lame excuses about why his failure is somebody else’s. he’s not a leader, and can hardly qualify as a man. the same can be said for you, if you judge a book by it’s content, that is.i would like to write more, but i have some leading to do know seeing as i am the manager of this office and it’s 32 employee’s.
[/quote]
There are some individuals on this forum who bandy about the term “right wing chearleader” at every turn and with wreckless abandon. Why is it that folks like Bradley, mazila, 100m, JTF, etc., never get called out for being leftist chearleaders?
Hmmmm.