T Nation

Bush Defector to Speak on 9/11


Bush Defector To Demolish
911 Lies On May 6

The former top economist in Bush's Department of Labor, Morgan Reynolds, will speak out on the 9/11 inside job at the State Historical Society, University of Wisconsin-Madison on Saturday, May 6th. The film Loose Change will be shown, and refreshments served, starting at 1 p.m, and Reynolds will speak at 3:00 p.m.

Dr. Reynolds, who holds three U.W.-Madison degrees, and who is currently Professor of Economics at Texas A&M University, will present evidence that top Bush Administration officials orchestrated the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center, and the murder of almost 2,500 Americans, as a pretext for initiating their pre-planned "long war" in the Middle East.

"While more Americans doubt the 9/11 story every week, evidence abounds that many have a mental block against rational examination of the evidence about 9/11" writes Dr. Reynolds in a recent article. This mental block, he thinks, amounts to willful ignorance-not just about 9/11, but about history.

"Governments throughout history have provoked or staged attacks on their own people to serve the powers behind the throne ('the money power'), glorify themselves, engage in vast government spending, reward friends, exert domestic control, stimulate the juices of war, annex neighbors and pursue vast geostrategic rearrangements (the 'global domination project)" Reynolds asserts. He notes that every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on the "Operation Northwoods" plan to murder Americans in fake "Cuban terrorist" attacks in 1962. The planned Operation Northwoods murders of ordinary Americans in fake terrorist bombings and a fake "airliner shoot-down" would have involved hundreds of military and intelligence personnel. Yet the existence of Operation Northwoods was successfully kept secret from the American people for forty years until James Bamford revealed it in his book Body of Secrets, published in January 2002.

Though government officials have historically been able to successfully conceal their fake or arranged war-trigger attacks long enough to avoid being hanged for treason, Reynolds thinks the 9/11 cover-up has already unraveled. "Skepticism about conspiracy, small or large, is somewhat beside the point in the case of 9/11 because the official Osama-and-Nineteen-Young-Arabs (ONYA) conspiracy tale is so farcical and impossible. Nearly everyone in America has easy access to the internet and hundreds of websites expose the 9/11 fraud." (Morgan Reynolds, "Conspiracy and Closed Minds on 9/11": http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911 )

Reynolds argues that the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7 were destroyed in a manner that can only be explained by controlled demolition with pre-planted explosives-which should not be surprising, since no steel framed high-rises have ever collapsed in the way the three World Trade Center buildings did for any other reason. In his article "Why Did the World Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse?" Reynolds writes that among the many features of the WTC demolitions that suggest explosives, rather than jet-fuel fires, are:

  1. Fire had never before caused steel-frame buildings to collapse except for the three buildings on 9/11, nor has fire collapsed any steel high rise since 9/11.

  2. The fires, especially in the South Tower and WTC-7, were small.

  3. WTC-7 was unharmed by an airplane and had only minor fires on the seventh and twelfth floors of this 47-story steel building yet it collapsed in less than 10 seconds.

  4. WTC-5 and WTC-6 had raging fires but did not collapse despite much thinner steel beams (pp. 68-9).

  5. In a PBS documentary, Larry Silverstein, the WTC lease-holder, recalled talking to the fire department commander on 9/11 about WTC-7 and said, ".maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it," slang for demolish it.

  6. FEMA, given the uninviting task of explaining the collapse of Building 7 with mention of demolition verboten admitted that the best it could come up with had "only a low probability of occurrence."

  7. It's difficult if not impossible for hydrocarbon fires like those fed by jet fuel (kerosene) to raise the temperature of steel close to melting.

Professional demolition, by contrast, can explain all of these facts and more. Demolition means placing explosives throughout a building, and detonating them in sequence to weaken "the structure so it collapses or folds in upon itself". In conventional demolitions gravity does most of the work, although it probably did a minority on

9/11, so heavily were the towers honeycombed with explosives.

  1. Each WTC building collapse occurred at virtually free-fall speed (approximately 10 seconds or less).

  2. Each building collapsed, for the most part, into its own footprint.

  3. Virtually all the concrete (an estimated 100,000 tons in each tower) on every floor was pulverized into a very fine dust, a phenomenon that requires enormous energy and could not be caused by gravity alone (".workers can't even find concrete. 'It's all dust,' [the official] said").

  4. Dust exploded horizontally for a couple hundred feet, as did debris, at the beginning of each tower's collapse.

  5. Collapses were total, leaving none of the massive core columns sticking up hundreds of feet into the air.

  6. Salvage experts were amazed at how small the debris stacks were.

  7. The steel beams and columns came down in sections under 30 feet long and had no signs of "softening"; there was little left but shorn sections of steel and a few bits of concrete.

  8. Photos and videos of the collapses all show "demolition waves," meaning "confluent rows of small explosions" along floors (blast sequences).

  9. According to many witnesses, explosions occurred within the buildings.

  10. Each collapse had detectable seismic vibrations suggestive of underground explosions, similar to the 2.3 earthquake magnitude from a demolition like the Seattle Kingdome (p. 108).

  11. Each collapse produced molten steel identical to that generated by explosives, resulting in "hot spots" that persisted for months (the two hottest spots at WTC-2 and WTC-7 were approximately 1,350o F five days after being continuously flooded with water, a temperature high enough to melt aluminum (p. 70). ("Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse?" by Morgan Reynolds: http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911 )

The apparent demolition of the three skyscrapers, and a perhaps inadvertent statement by heavily-insured WTC landlord Larry Silverstein that WTC-7 was "pulled" (slang for "demolished") can be viewed on many 9/11 truth DVDs and web-videos, including Loose Change, 9/11 Eyewitness, 9/11 and the American Empire, (Dr. David Griffin), and 9/11 Revisited (Dr. Steven Jones). Dr. Reynolds' articles on 9/11 and other matters can be found at http://nomoregames.net .
The videos, and further information about Dr. Reynolds' May 6th speech, are available from the event's sponsor, the Madison-based Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth: http://mujca.com


1) He's an economist
2) His claims are the EXACT same bullshit every other conspiracy kook has been saying for 4 years.


HEY, I take issue with that comment!


Now offense intended, of course. I'm just sayin'...


I still don't understand WHY Bush would order 9/11? To steal Iraqi oil? Surely a guy who could orchestrate the murder of 2,500 Americans and get away with it would be smart enough not to drag us into an unending war where we're losing money and not securing oil?

Or was it to seize power and hold it indefinitely as a dictator under the guise of a national emergency? But wait, isn't his party quite likely going to lose Congress in a few months?

Could you please explain jlesk, I'm confused.


jlesk just posts this stuff for the humor factor.

Can you imagine Bush confiding all the secrets of alleged 9/11 conspiracy to some random economist? It is not like he was involved in the planning. He just worked in the government in an unrelated function.

There are a lot of loons out there. The cottage industry built up around these nutty 9/11 theories reminds me of the UFO conventions they used to have.


I have the perfect explanation for all of this, and I'm thinking "screenplay for a summer movie" kind of stuff right now.

9/11 WAS A DISTRACTION FROM THE REAL, HORRIFYING TRUTH. All those goofballs that used to camp out near area 51 looking for strange lights and shit... it was all real. Bush was contacted by the aliens (there's a bunch of cool special effects and shit when we show the flashback with big-eyed midgets in alien suits teleporting into the oval office catching Dubya doing a line of uncut Nicaraguan snow off of a hooker's bare ass), and told that he needed to prepare for an incoming invasion of "Gheys". You see, the UFO nuts called them "Greys", but they got a letter transposed wrong.

Anyway, the little alien mini-me's tell Dubya that he needs to create this big tragedy to unite his nation so that we can prepare for the most threatening thing THAT HAS EVER BEFALLEN THE HUMAN RACE. The alien computers tell them that the first contact with the enemy will happen near the birthplace of human civilization... somewhere in modern-day Iraq. We must be ready to hit them fast, and hit them hard, for the Gheys will show no mercy, as they need to consume our cerebrospinal fluid to survive for extended periods away from their "life-affirmators", devices which extend their lifespans to hundreds of years.

Extra bonus: it turns out that the Evil Lord Xenu (from scientology) is REAL. He is the one who drove the Gheys from their corner of the galaxy to invade ours, so it's really HIS fault that all this is happening in the first place! GODDAMN I HATE THAT GUY!

Anyway, I figure we can get Tom Cruise, but I still need to cast a semi-decent (and not to tall) hot chick as a "love interest" for Tom's character. He's not ready to come out of the closet yet.

Ideas, anyone?



It's the same BS warmed over and reserved.

     China is developing its military rapidly, and is very hungry for oil. At her current rate she will quickly outpace America through sheer force of  numbers. But at this rate oil consumption is raising every day, demand is growing in every developed country in the world, compounding this issue is the fact that oil peaking may be in the very near future. China and (maybe) Russia would certainly want some of this ME oil when the rest of the world dries out, compounding this issue is their close proximity, America's separation and distance is now a supreme disadvantage for protecting its interests physically in resource 'hot spots,' and these indeed are hot spots, being one of the last major sources of oil in the world when peaking inevitably occurs.

You could sustain an argument that the US doesn't have any interest in Afghanistan, and Iraq, and Iranian oil with the fact that we have not pilfered or pillaged them, and are in a perpetual 'phase of reconstruction,' but by reconstructing Iraq we are given a legal loophole to station forces there, to deploy permanent bases and now have a 'valid' reason for military and economic interests of that country, giving us direct control of their resources. Consequently the worlds last major oil fields will coincidentally be no more then a few hundred miles from permanent US bases with a pro US government.

Maybe oil peaking may be much nearer then we, the public, know about?



Read the truth!!



O.K. look, I really hate the Bush administration, I mean REALLY HATE IT. But even I have a hard time believing something like this. I don't even wish it were true so I could say "told ya so".

It really bothers me that people keep claiming this to be true. How would you feel if you lost a loved one in this tragedy and some wack-job comes around claiming that it was done on purpose by our government.

Rove is evil, but not that evil.


I would like everyone to think about where these nutty conspiracy theories are coming from.





Alex Jones is a world class douchebag.

I do like the caption under the video clip:

"Watch Alex's appearance on CNN's Showbiz Tonight in which he not only successfully defends Charlie Sheen but also batters the Globalists with a raft of facts on the 9/11 inside job."

If by "successfully defends" they meant "sweats out at least 4 gallons while talking in circles", they were dead on.


Talking in circles? Explain.


Alot of these conspiracy people are a little overboard, but the fact remains that there still needs to be many questions answered. There needs to be an indepedent investigation on 9/11.

The 9/11 commission was by no means independent, the president chose the head, and the president and dick cheney when asked to testify and the hearings did so under three conditions, one being that they would NOT be under oath and they would testify together and also that their comments would not be shown to the press, doesn't that sound a little fishy to anyone.

video camera's that caught the pentagon attacks, their tapes were immediately confiscated by fbi agents, till this day those tapes have not been released, besides five frames in which no plane can be identified. and there has been almost no mass media coverage of the issues of the 9/11 war games, the "amazing coincidence" of a "plane into building" exercise being conducted that morning, or the alleged role of Vice President Richard Cheney in overseeing the war games that morning. these war games severely decapitated any defense that we had against the attacks

there are many more questions, like how wtc 7 collapsed etc. and i would think that any good citizen would want these questions answered, patriotism is not blind ignorance and taking things as they are given to you, we must question these things if we are to know the truth.


here's one place to look, a quote from
Project for the New American Century's Chapter V, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force"
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event ? like a new Pearl Harbor."

oh and dick cheney is the president of the PNAC



Also, let's not forget the incredible coincidence of Arnold Swarzenegger filming a movie about terrorists bombing the WTC and then it happened. Amazingly, he becomes the Governor of California shortly thereafter... dodging the normal voting process, the ordinary campaigning... he becomes Governor on a referendum vote.

Arnold caused 9/11. Duh.


lothario1132 i am not saying that 9/11 was an inside job, did you even read what i wrote man, look at some of these things and tell me you arent a little worried, now why the heck woul bush and cheney refuse to be under oath while testifying to the 9/11 commission. I am not a conspiracy nut, but after looking at the facts on both sides, i don't know who to believe


LOL Relax man, I'm just playin' with ya. My point is that when you start drawing conclusions about shit based on coincidences, you have to be careful.

Why would Bush and Cheney not go under oath? Well, shit. Maybe they wanted to be more candid than they would have been otherwise. Maybe they had conflicting information at some point and had to make judgement calls after flipping a coin on some stuff.

Point is, if they are so evil and whatnot to have had any, ANY part in 9/11, then why would they suddenly have some kind of compunction against testifying under oath?

"OOOOO!!!! They want me to promise NOT TO LIE!! I can't do THAT!!! Sure, I can aid and abet the murderers of some 3000 Americans on our own soil, destroying untold amount of lives and property, but I HAVE TO DRAW THE LINE SOMEWHERE!!! GOOD GOD I CANNOT POSSIBLY LIE UNDER OATH!!!!"

Come on. Please tell me that you are smarter than this. :slight_smile: