[quote]orion wrote:
unforgiven2 wrote:
PGJ wrote:
orion wrote:
PGJ wrote:
Does anyone really care?
Yes.
I do.
From smoking hot to trailer park trash in less than 5 years…
Admitt it, you still remember her tiny little schoolgirl outfit…
Brittany never did anything for me. Not into the pseudo-pedo, school-girl thing.
She’s just another tradgic case of low-class with wayyyyyy too much money.
Agreed!!!
You are both wrong.
For this is Brittany and she is as hot as she ever was…[/quote]
That chick is nothing more than a stick figure.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Hotter than ever!!
NOT!!!
BLEARY SPEARS AN ‘OLDIE’ [/quote]
Seriously, though. She hasn’t fall that far.
Just like good photography and lighting can make a ho-hum person look downright smoking hot, a shitty picture like that with full frontal flash and a lousy expression/no prep.
Sure, she’ll look terrible. Anyone in those circumstances
[quote]jedidiah wrote:
Sure, she’ll look terrible. Anyone in those circumstances[/quote]
What circumstances? Alcoholic, drug addicted, and living life like it’s one long after party? That has never made people look too good. Shit, Madonna has way more class than that…and that’s saying something.
Dear God, what is that… Thing? If she wasn’t wealthy she’d be a prostitute by now.
Photoshop. It’s the NY Post.
She doesn’t look as hot as she once did, but i’m sure she looked that shitty at points, and she still looks as hot as the before at some points.
It’s about picture timing, and the skill of NY Post photo editors.
This is why I hate the Post… it sucks.
Thats a fucking travesty.
I like the name Britney Rears.