[quote]arramzy wrote:
[quote]StormTheBeach wrote:
[quote]arramzy wrote:
[quote]StormTheBeach wrote:
[quote]arramzy wrote:
Whenever I read threads like this I always laugh. There are a million great exercises out there including all these variations of box squat heights and width and trap bar deadlits etc etc etc… But frankly, for anyone (especially someone who I am guessing is a bit of a beginner in the weight room) I think the answer should be simple - squat. While all the others are great moves to be incorporated into training, nothing is better than squating.
Did you ever watch power unlimited? hahaha best line ever
“leave your pssy at home, strap on your cck and bend those knees”
I should note that I am in no way trashing the use of box squats as primary motions like in westside training, but especially for this guy who is asking as an ‘athlete’, he is probably not worried about using hardcore gear, but just needs a solid foundation, so basic motions should be learned first.[/quote]
If just squatting made your squat better, why not just go compete every single weekend? Your weights will just go up forever until you have the world record.[/quote]
All I was saying is that for someone who clearly isn’t trying to be a powerlifter, but just wants to use the powerlifting exercises to improve himself in sports, I think basic motions, like the squat, are the best. That being said, you can’t max squat every week. I lift IPF and squat 3 times a week and have put on about 200 pounds on my squat in the past year (from just below 400 to about 600, at 83kg bodyweight). Frankly, if you follow most of the great lifters in NON HIGHLY GEARED powerlifting, they just plain squat… A lot… Back to this thread, as an ‘athlete’, I doubt he even uses knee wraps… Sooooo probably just squatting will work the best. But again, using other exercises have their place for sure… If you train for double ply monolift squatting, then I would agree that box squats, GM etc are indeed the MAJORITY of your training. But hey, there are guys that squat 4x bodyweight in single ply so what they do must work also.[/quote]
Especially if someone isn’t trying to be a powerlifter and compete, they should be using primarily box squats. The stress on the knees is lower, the recovery time is faster, the learning curve is shorter, and all of the lagging posterior chain muscles that get hurt all the time in athletes get stronger. Bigger squats does not mean a better athlete. There is about zero correlation in being a good squatter and being a good athlete. For explosive sports, like the one the OP competes in, basically everything done in the gym will be GPP. His goal is to be a stronger more powerful athlete. That comes with practicing the movements required to execute the sporting skills as efficinetly as possible. Again, everything he does in the weight room will help develop motor potential but will do very little to help him display his technical ability when it comes time to compete.
Athletes need to be athletic. Not just good at squatting. It’s impossible to tell him what is best for him if you have never seen him in real life. Blanket statements about methods you don’t understand for powerlifting will not help answer the question the OP had about physical development for his sport.[/quote]
I am really not trying to argue… But there is in fact a very strong relationship between how much you can squat and how high you can jump and how fast you can sprint…
Br J Sports Med2004;38:285-288
J of Applied Sport Science Research 1992, 6, 1, 36-41.
There are many more papers you can find that show this. So again, yes, squatting more will more than likely help someone who wants to throw something far.[/quote]
You totally missed the point of what I was saying. Squatting will most definitely help develop motor potential (strength, size, power, etc.) and there are thousands of studies to show this. The problem is just being able to jump higher and sprint faster do not independently make someone a better athlete. The only way these skills will help athletic performance is if the athlete can display these skills with technical perfection on the field.
Think about D1 football players. I bet they can all sprint pretty fast and jump pretty high but, only 1% actually make it to professional football. In the 99% that get left behind, there are some bigger squats and higher jumps than the 1% that gets to move up.
All things being equal, higher motor potential will transfer to higher athletic performance. When the hell is everything else equal in the real world? Also, if just being strong, fast, and powerful made an athlete better at their sport, then why do they ever practice the game? Why wouldn’t they just lift, sprint, and jump?
I have read the Book of Methods too. It’s the most confusing jumbled mess and I’m pretty sure reading it straight through will give you a brain tumor. I read a cookbook once. That doesn’t mean I am a chef now.