I feel sorry for the business that hired you.
Is it 60% for single-payer?
First it was 50% for single-payer, now 60% for all entitlements. Is this true f the majority of countries?
I for one am truly flabbergasted you donât understand how government financing works.
Just shocked I say.
Gosh, that really hurts my feelings coming from a clown like you.
I just want you to accurately describe what entitlements are included in the taxation. Are their taxes at this level because of universal healthcare? A system that costs far less with often better outcomes, doesnât force people into medical bankruptcy and covers everyone is far better than what we have now or before ACA. What do you recommend and where has it been successfully tried?
The rationing of healthcare has awful results. Viva la U.S. âhealthcareâ The results of a For-Profit system
news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2009/09/new-study-finds-45000-deaths-annually-linked-to-lack-of-health-coverage/
Super better outcomes ⊠like all the betters. Every. Better. Ever.
4 Likes
Dude, you just relink the same dumb tired shit.
Super tough stuff here.
Oh look, the same tired statement.
https://www.cnn.com/2015/09/02/politics/va-inspector-general-report/index.html
What were these surgeries? Elective? And it depends as their system is based on need first. So if you have a more pressing issue than I, I just have to wait. Maybe a reason the surgeries were cancelled. And GB doesnât have single-payer it has socialized healthcare.
Does it matter? Theyâre supposed to cover everyone. Thatâs your argument right?
Bro, they can just wait. Who needs surgery amirite?? Itâs just a way for Big Surgery to make money anyway. Holistic crystals will heal that torn ACL.
First off the VA system is not single-payer.
From the CBO.
April, 1993 Congressional Budget Office
âUnder a single payer system with co-payments âŠon average, people would have an additional $54 to spendâŠmore specifically, the increase in taxes⊠would be about $856 per capitaâŠprivate-sector costs would decrease by $910 per capita.
The net cost of achieving universal insurance coverage under this single payer system would be negative.â
Gawd that would be so awful.
âŠ
Two and a half decade old data. Thank you for that relevant response.
Yes it does matter as elective surgeries are just that, they are not necessary. So their healthcare may be rationed. However, it is rationed based on need not your bank account.
Explain the difference.
Quick and oversimplified math:
Federal revenue is budgeted at like $3.5T. Now it needs to be $5.4T.
By the way, weâre running a $683 Billion deficit and are now over $20T in debt.
But FUCK YA letâs switch to Single-Payer!
*Cost/person would be less, but by how muchâŠ
1 Like
Directly from one of your sources.
. Universal health care is a source of collective pride in Canada, which boasts one of the highest life expectancies and lowest infant mortality rates in the world.
Also from the same source.
The Commonwealth Fund, a U.S. think tank, released a report two years ago ranking Canada 10th out of 11 wealthy nations in terms of health care. Only the United States fared worse. The report, based largely on satisfaction surveys by patients and health-care providers, placed Canada last in timeliness of care. The United Kingdom was ranked No. 1The Commonwealth Fund, a U.S. think tank, released a report two years ago ranking Canada 10th out of 11 wealthy nations in terms of health care. Only the United States fared worse. The report, based largely on satisfaction surveys by patients and health-care providers, placed Canada last in timeliness of care. The United Kingdom was ranked No. 1
Oh no GB ranked no. 1. How is that possible it is socialized medicine?
And those 52,513 Canadians were traveling to other countries for non-emergency care. You may be able to find a handful of examples of tragedies but are they statistically significant?
If all these people are dying from waiting for care then why do they keep voting for it and if single-payer has failed everytime it is tried why does the population vote for politicians that expouse it? Maybe you can contact all those countries and let them know they are doing the wrong thing and ought to follow the U.S. system? I guess all those countries are colluding in their studies against the U.S. system, huh?
Wow the Austalian system is a mess because people waited for elective surgery. So their system is based on need not their wallet. How awful!
Has the VA been effected by lack of funding? Maybe all those tax cuts werenât good.
So? This has literally nothing at all to do with the conversation.
Americanâs take pride in not being overtaxed so, by your logic (almost fell over laughing writing that), weâll never have a universal system here because of the tax implications.
Customer satisfaction surveys, cool⊠The lowerst form of evidence known to man. I would definitely build my case on surveys.
Youâre joking, right? Your bot acting up, again? Flu got your troll skills down? You bring up healthcare-related bankruptcy 5x a week, which affect .6% of the population.
Because people are irrational. Youâre a prime example of this.
No, see, thatâs the difference between you and I. Well, one of the thousands of differences anyway. I donât give a fuck what Europeans do. Let em be taxed to death, fuck if I care. Thatâs on them.
Again, this is typical Zep horseshit. Itâs totally cool that they have to wait for the surgeries they want. Their outcomes are worse, but that doesnât count because of some stupid ass parameter YOU put on it.
Ya, thatâs it. Youâre a fucking idiot.
Whether you like it or not, it will eventually be here, if we can stem the tide of corporatist politicians. How much can the public take as their politicians do the bidding of the ultra-rich and corporations? What will you do when the sky doesnât fall?
The Commonwealth Fund is only buy one study. While the majority of the studies come to roughly the same conclusion.
www.pnhp.org/facts/single-payer-system-cost
Youâre joking, right? Your bot acting up, again? Flu got your troll skills down? You bring up healthcare-related bankruptcy 5x a week, which affect .6% of the population.
As if that number is acceptable. What would you say if it happened to you or a family member? What is the percentages of BKâs in countries that have single-payer?
Your explanation of irrationality of others is laughable. You have not posted a system for healthcare as of yet. And where it has been successfully implemented because you have none. You live outside of reality. The theories you believe in have disastrous results when tried in the real world and people get hurt. So you more aptly fit the irrational people mold.
Yes taxes will increase under a single-payer system but you wonât be paying a monthly premium. So therefore you will come out on top financially.
Even Trump praised the Australian healthcare system. Saying it was better than ours. But now has reversed his thoughts because the swamp has drained him.
And you essentially only have accusations.
Still waiting on you to explain the difference between:
and:
Iâll be here all day. Waiting with bated breath