Since you are behind policies that make the public suffer I could care less.
Iād take him over a fuzzy headed stoner incapable of coherent thought.
Also heās in a research university, not employed by a ācorporationā, plain or otherwise.
So who funds the university? And Iām the furthest thing from a stoner.
Which policies, pray tell?
Why clinical trials are necessary has been explained to you at least a dozen times. Good grief.
It means he actually knows what the fuck heās talking about unlike a YouTube educated moron.
The policies that require clinical trials before something is released in public. His wet dream.
Sooooooo, you want medication to be unregulated like say supplements?
But there are tens of thousands of people being helped already without clinical trials, so once again you fail big time.
It means he actually knows what the fuck heās talking about unlike a YouTube educated moron. Your reply doesnāt answer the question. Not surprised!
Has been explainedā¦
No it hasnāt. Maybe to your ultra-low standards but not by any real way.
Well youāre high as a kite and also a sellout so really what you think doesnāt matter. It HAS been explained, youāre just too ideologically blinded to see it or accept it.
Dude, youāve had actual real-life Ph.dās explain this to you. Just fuck off already.
There are, unfortunately people on this forum who believe nothing should be released to the public, medically, unless it 1st has clinical studies done. But medicinal marijuana had no clinical studies done prior to itās approval in California. It was only approved because of public pressure. When other people saw how successful it was they demanded the same thing. If the public had to listen to you then they would be forced to take the meds provided by Big Pharma. Nice business model. They call it a monopoly.
A PhD in what? Business and corporate charters. Or the medical industry?
Well, mine is in epidemiology, specifically cardiovascular disease epidemiology, with a couple other advanced degrees in statistics and applied statistics. Iāve published papers in obstetrics, gynecology, oncology, diabetes, and a variety of surgical journals in addition to my work in cardiovascular disease, which encompasses coronary disease, arrhythmia, heart failure, ventricular assist devices, transplant, aortic valve disease, mitral valve disease.
Clinical studies are necessary to determine the safety and efficacy of any therapy, as weāve discussed before. If nothing else, this is a consumer protection issue. People have the right to know whether a therapy thatās being marketed to them actually does what the maker says that it does. Youāve ranted about this in almost every thread youāve ever participated, but the truth is that the FDA is the only line of defense that prevents āBig Pharmaā from running completely unchecked in that regard.
As weāve discussed elsewhere, the rainbow unicorn planet where weāll have single-payer healthcare without a requirement that any therapy be rigorously studied before approval cannot exist. These two things are fundamentally impossible to have in the same health system. Either you get single-player with very strict rules about what is and isnāt ācoveredā (rules which will be made by rigorous study), or you can have a world where any magic bean can be marketed and sold as āmedicineā - but thereās no way single player can possibly pay for everything.
Good lord, manā¦
Prepare for, something something revolving door something something ideology something something better outcomes something somethingā¦
Iām fairly certain that a decent programmer could write a good auto-generator of Zeppelin posts.
Theyāre almost as formulaic as Trump tweets.
Would you include medicinal marijuana as magic beans?
Your credentials are not impressive or applicable and mean relatively little in corporate charters or in modern business practices.
Clinical trials very often are doctored so that Big Pharmaās latest money-making drug can produce profits for them. As evidenced by the commercials for drugs followed by ads from law firms suing the manufacturers of those drugs. Safety is more of a smoke screen. Profits are the real goal and purpose at any expense.
Medicare-for-all is coming so the rip-off artists in the health industry field have to find a new job as they canāt rip-off the public for their own personal gain any longer. Hopefully Big Pharma is next in the cross-hairs. In Japan you only have to prove your product is safe before releasing it to the public(stem cell treatments anyways). So while several countries are streamlining their approval processes the U.S. is being left behind. And it is the public who suffers. Anyone who agrees with this system either doesnāt have a clue of what they are talking about or are completely brainwashed by decades of propaganda.
A PhD in the health industry? If so, how do those credentials give him the expertise of knowing how the C.E.O. and Board of Directors make their business decisions? It is ultimately a business you know.