[quote]tmoney1 wrote:
malonetd wrote:
KJ Bridgewater wrote:
Btw, I dont believe Bonds was the best of his time. I think Ken Griffey Jr was a better overall player NATURALLY.
I think that’s part of the problem with this whole issue. How do you know Griffey is/was natural?
I was watching Baseball Tonight on ESPN a couple of years ago, and they were talking about big homerun hitters who are not speculated of steroid use (Jr., A-Rod, Thome, Big Hurt, etc.). They said all these guys are clean, and at the time, Junior had taken over 200 drug tests and not failed a single one.
I feel it’s unfair to assume he’s taking any steroids, and I don’t think he has taken them or is currently taking them, as well as the other guys mentioned. All of those guys have been hitting a lot of homeruns since they started in the majors, and I don’t think steroids has anything to do with it.
On a side note: If Junior would have stayed healthy the past few seasons (he’s missed about 500 games (over 3 full seasons)), him and Bonds would probably be neck and neck for the homerun crown.[/quote]
Bonds has never tested positive… I think it is unfair to assume they are NOT when Bonds has when he has NOT tested positive… (yes their is just about everything BUT a positive drug test but in this country you are innocent untell proven guilty.)
I do not think Griffey Jr is juiced up but the double standard stems from the MEDIA portraying Bonds as evil and all juiced up. If it is shoved in peoples faces enough they will go along with it.
Hell look at what is happening to A-Rod after the media decided they didn’t like him a couple months ago.
Also on the point of hitting lots of homeruns since they got to the bigs.
Mark McGwire hit 49 homesruns his rookie season.
just my thoughts on it T$