This where you go totally off the rails, Danny. If you had “gyno,” and now you don’t, then you never had actual fibrous gynecomastia. If you had, and you let E2 run unmanaged, you would fully understand the impact of E2 on breast gland tissue. Trust me.
I have no idea what “your protocol needs work” is supposed to mean in this context. You continue to push dogma beyond what is reasonable or useful for all men.
You are also self-contradictory. Right in the video you claim that if serum levels of E2 are “low,” and gyno occurs, then E2 can’t be causative. Just a couple days ago you said in this forum that because E2 is a paracrine hormone, serum levels are meaningless.