Anything New about the Teaparty?

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Please somebody, anybody explain to me…why I am racist for wanting to halt illegal immigration.

Why is it ok for minorities to say and do racist things…and nobody does a damn thing.

Does the so called “white liberal guilt” run that deep?
[/quote]

Yes, it does run that deep.

These people seem to think that we white people owe them something, and since we aren’t giving them jack shit, law enforcement and politicians look the other way when they break the law.

UtahLama, half our deficit, repeat HALF our deficit is related to illegal alien costs. But no one is even addressing it, but oh they will, because tax increases and extensions will not be passed here. Cuts are coming, to the tune of $29 Billion. Thunderdome is coming here, I can’t fucking wait.

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

Why is it ok to be racist towards white people[/quote]

It isn’t. That’s a shitty story about your grandma, those people were fucktards.[/quote]

Again, I am not trying to sound repetitive here…but a micro portion of the Tea party is racist…so the whole group gets the label.

A part of the Democratic party voting block (some minorities) are just as racist…yet the whole party gets a free pass…why?

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Please somebody, anybody explain to me…why I am racist for wanting to halt illegal immigration.

Why is it ok for minorities to say and do racist things…and nobody does a damn thing.

Does the so called “white liberal guilt” run that deep?
[/quote]

Yes, it does run that deep.

These people seem to think that we white people owe them something, and since we aren’t giving them jack shit, law enforcement and politicians look the other way when they break the law.

UtahLama, half our deficit, repeat HALF our deficit is related to illegal alien costs. But no one is even addressing it, but oh they will, because tax increases and extensions will not be passed here. Cuts are coming, to the tune of $29 Billion. Thunderdome is coming here, I can’t fucking wait. [/quote]

So you are saying the legal system will improve?

Well, good news I think.

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

Why is it ok to be racist towards white people[/quote]

It isn’t. That’s a shitty story about your grandma, those people were fucktards.[/quote]

Again, I am not trying to sound repetitive here…but a micro portion of the Tea party is racist…so the whole group gets the label.

A part of the Democratic party voting block (some minorities) are just as racist…yet the whole party gets a free pass…why? [/quote]

Because you are a white devil.

Your ancestors enslaved people (yet there were also black slave traders too.)

True story here in So Cal…

In Orange County, a couple of white kids beat up a minority kid (not sure what minority he is yet.) Cops arrest the kids, and charges of a hate crime are being pursued. Here at Dodger Stadium, an off-duty paramedic (white guy father of 2) was beaten by Latino gangmembers for wearing a Giants jersey. Yes, he was beaten into a coma, beaten even when he was laying on the ground unconscious. Are hate crime charges being filed? Nope. Why? Because the Latino mayor doesn’t want to offend the Hispanic population here. The gangmembers are still at large. The owner of the Dodgers has been ridiculed for lack of security, the same gang element that has set roots into the Dodger culture, said that this was an isolated incident (again to not inflame the Latino people of Los Angeles.)

It’s a fucking joke.

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

Why is it ok to be racist towards white people[/quote]

It isn’t. That’s a shitty story about your grandma, those people were fucktards.[/quote]

Again, I am not trying to sound repetitive here…but a micro portion of the Tea party is racist…so the whole group gets the label.

A part of the Democratic party voting block (some minorities) are just as racist…yet the whole party gets a free pass…why? [/quote]

The word micro is where we disagree.

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Please somebody, anybody explain to me…why I am racist for wanting to halt illegal immigration.

Why is it ok for minorities to say and do racist things…and nobody does a damn thing.

Does the so called “white liberal guilt” run that deep?
[/quote]

Yes, it does run that deep.

These people seem to think that we white people owe them something, and since we aren’t giving them jack shit, law enforcement and politicians look the other way when they break the law.

UtahLama, half our deficit, repeat HALF our deficit is related to illegal alien costs. But no one is even addressing it, but oh they will, because tax increases and extensions will not be passed here. Cuts are coming, to the tune of $29 Billion. Thunderdome is coming here, I can’t fucking wait. [/quote]

So you are saying the legal system will improve?

Well, good news I think.

[/quote]

A townhall meeting today took place, where the governor talked about trying to find ways to raise taxes without the votes. People asked the governor what would happen if he couldn’t raise taxes, those people were escorted out of the townhall. Goes to show you his loyalties to the Union whore-masters.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

Why is it ok to be racist towards white people[/quote]

It isn’t. That’s a shitty story about your grandma, those people were fucktards.[/quote]

Again, I am not trying to sound repetitive here…but a micro portion of the Tea party is racist…so the whole group gets the label.

A part of the Democratic party voting block (some minorities) are just as racist…yet the whole party gets a free pass…why? [/quote]

Because you are a white devil.

Your ancestors enslaved people (yet there were also black slave traders too.)

True story here in So Cal…

In Orange County, a couple of white kids beat up a minority kid (not sure what minority he is yet.) Cops arrest the kids, and charges of a hate crime are being pursued. Here at Dodger Stadium, an off-duty paramedic (white guy father of 2) was beaten by Latino gangmembers for wearing a Giants jersey. Yes, he was beaten into a coma, beaten even when he was laying on the ground unconscious. Are hate crime charges being filed? Nope. Why? Because the Latino mayor doesn’t want to offend the Hispanic population here. The gangmembers are still at large. The owner of the Dodgers has been ridiculed for lack of security, the same gang element that has set roots into the Dodger culture, said that this was an isolated incident (again to not inflame the Latino people of Los Angeles.)

It’s a fucking joke. [/quote]

While you are probably very close to the truth…I doubt very seriously that anybody will admit it. Something to the effect of… “you owe us, now bend over and take it”

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

Why is it ok to be racist towards white people[/quote]

It isn’t. That’s a shitty story about your grandma, those people were fucktards.[/quote]

Again, I am not trying to sound repetitive here…but a micro portion of the Tea party is racist…so the whole group gets the label.

A part of the Democratic party voting block (some minorities) are just as racist…yet the whole party gets a free pass…why? [/quote]

The word micro is where we disagree.[/quote]

The Tea Party IS a micro party…so if you have 1,000,000 members and 1000 are racist…that is a micro not a macro situation nationwide.

You have 100,000,000 minorities… if the same percentages hold (and I imagine they are close) that is a LOT of Democratic supporting racists.

Yes UL, without lube even.

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

Why is it ok to be racist towards white people[/quote]

It isn’t. That’s a shitty story about your grandma, those people were fucktards.[/quote]

Again, I am not trying to sound repetitive here…but a micro portion of the Tea party is racist…so the whole group gets the label.

A part of the Democratic party voting block (some minorities) are just as racist…yet the whole party gets a free pass…why? [/quote]

The word micro is where we disagree.[/quote]

The Tea Party IS a micro party…so if you have 1,000,000 members and 1000 are racist…that is a micro not a macro situation nationwide.

You have 100,000,000 minorities… if the same percentages hold (and I imagine they are close) that is a LOT of Democratic supporting racists.[/quote]

No. Proportions tell us more about political and social groups than do absolute values. If you were to lay out the proportions of overtly racist constituents I believe that the Tea Party would beat most major political movements in America today.

If the Republican party is made up of 100 million people and two are murderers, I wouldn’t say it’s a party of murderers. If I start a club with one other guy and we are both murderers, it’s a different story isn’t it? Even though the absolute numbers are identical.

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

Why is it ok to be racist towards white people[/quote]

It isn’t. That’s a shitty story about your grandma, those people were fucktards.[/quote]

Again, I am not trying to sound repetitive here…but a micro portion of the Tea party is racist…so the whole group gets the label.

A part of the Democratic party voting block (some minorities) are just as racist…yet the whole party gets a free pass…why? [/quote]

The word micro is where we disagree.[/quote]

The Tea Party IS a micro party…so if you have 1,000,000 members and 1000 are racist…that is a micro not a macro situation nationwide.

You have 100,000,000 minorities… if the same percentages hold (and I imagine they are close) that is a LOT of Democratic supporting racists.[/quote]

No. Proportions tell us more about political and social groups than do absolute values. If you were to lay out the proportions of overtly racist constituents I believe that the Tea Party would beat most major political movements in America today.

If the Republican party is made up of 100 million people and two are murderers, I wouldn’t say it’s a party of murderers. If I start a club with one other guy and we are both murderers, it’s a different story isn’t it? Even though the absolute numbers are identical.[/quote]

OK again, fair enough…you think that a large group of (mostly not all white) people that believe in extreme fiscal responsibility and a return to traditional values has a large racist component. Because of a few videos and reports from (I’m sure highly conservative lol) media.

I have just as many videos and articles of minorities acting in a racist manner, but Dems never get the label…thats my point.

Racists occur in every party, but only the predominately white (GOP/Tea Party) get labeled as racists by the main stream media.

Why?

Because the “hate whitey” train has to be keep rollin’ on.

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Because the “hate whitey” train has to be keep rollin’ on. [/quote]

I’m beginning to think that a few people out there don’t like whitey one bit…I shall now turn the Chappell Show (my favorite fwiw) and laugh at some white stereotypes.

I think racist is a little hard, I dont get the feeling that our teaparty residents are racists, but
reactionarys suits some of them. When people show so much hatred towards unions and immigrants as some here do, I get a bit suspicious. Anti-unionism and anti-immigration is the core of brownish-rightwing movements in Europa. Do you teaparty fellows want to have any thing to do with them, I hope not.

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

Why is it ok to be racist towards white people[/quote]

It isn’t. That’s a shitty story about your grandma, those people were fucktards.[/quote]

Again, I am not trying to sound repetitive here…but a micro portion of the Tea party is racist…so the whole group gets the label.

A part of the Democratic party voting block (some minorities) are just as racist…yet the whole party gets a free pass…why? [/quote]

The word micro is where we disagree.[/quote]

The Tea Party IS a micro party…so if you have 1,000,000 members and 1000 are racist…that is a micro not a macro situation nationwide.

You have 100,000,000 minorities… if the same percentages hold (and I imagine they are close) that is a LOT of Democratic supporting racists.[/quote]

No. Proportions tell us more about political and social groups than do absolute values. If you were to lay out the proportions of overtly racist constituents I believe that the Tea Party would beat most major political movements in America today.

If the Republican party is made up of 100 million people and two are murderers, I wouldn’t say it’s a party of murderers. If I start a club with one other guy and we are both murderers, it’s a different story isn’t it? Even though the absolute numbers are identical.[/quote]

OK again, fair enough…you think that a large group of (mostly not all white) people that believe in extreme fiscal responsibility and a return to traditional values has a large racist component. Because of a few videos and reports from (I’m sure highly conservative lol) media.

I have just as many videos and articles of minorities acting in a racist manner, but Dems never get the label…thats my point. [/quote]

I have repeatedly said that the fiscal conservatives in the movement don’t deserve criticism. The racist elements do, and by many accounts they are substantial.

yes, these accounts come from the media–but I’m talking about respectable media. The article I quoted earlier was from the Wash. Post. I get my news from the major sources: the BBC, the New York Times, the WSJ, the CSM, etc. In their editorial pages all of these have a decidedly ideological slant, but in the reporting of news they are nowhere near as biased as people like to depict them. Facts are facts. When the New York Times gets something wrong, which they inevitably will, they make the correction. However, take a look at the corrections page…“we misstated the number of brazieres Ms. Hilton buys in a given week”, etc. These are not major ideological problems. News is news and in reputable sources of it in America are about as trustworthy as we can expect.

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

Why is it ok to be racist towards white people[/quote]

It isn’t. That’s a shitty story about your grandma, those people were fucktards.[/quote]

Again, I am not trying to sound repetitive here…but a micro portion of the Tea party is racist…so the whole group gets the label.

A part of the Democratic party voting block (some minorities) are just as racist…yet the whole party gets a free pass…why? [/quote]

The word micro is where we disagree.[/quote]

The Tea Party IS a micro party…so if you have 1,000,000 members and 1000 are racist…that is a micro not a macro situation nationwide.

You have 100,000,000 minorities… if the same percentages hold (and I imagine they are close) that is a LOT of Democratic supporting racists.[/quote]

No. Proportions tell us more about political and social groups than do absolute values. If you were to lay out the proportions of overtly racist constituents I believe that the Tea Party would beat most major political movements in America today.

If the Republican party is made up of 100 million people and two are murderers, I wouldn’t say it’s a party of murderers. If I start a club with one other guy and we are both murderers, it’s a different story isn’t it? Even though the absolute numbers are identical.[/quote]

OK again, fair enough…you think that a large group of (mostly not all white) people that believe in extreme fiscal responsibility and a return to traditional values has a large racist component. Because of a few videos and reports from (I’m sure highly conservative lol) media.

I have just as many videos and articles of minorities acting in a racist manner, but Dems never get the label…thats my point. [/quote]

I have repeatedly said that the fiscal conservatives in the movement don’t deserve criticism. The racist elements do, and by many accounts they are substantial.

yes, these accounts come from the media–but I’m talking about respectable media. The article I quoted earlier was from the Wash. Post. I get my news from the major sources: the BBC, the New York Times, the WSJ, the CSM, etc. In their editorial pages all of these have a decidedly ideological slant, but in the reporting of news they are nowhere near as biased as people like to depict them. Facts are facts. When the New York Times gets something wrong, which they inevitably will, they make the correction. However, take a look at the corrections page…“we misstated the number of brazieres Ms. Hilton buys in a given week”, etc. These are not major ideological problems. News is news and in reputable sources of it in America are about as trustworthy as we can expect.[/quote]

I think one of the problems with the tea party is their strong point, not having a clear agenda .
Possibly when they focus on one they will be good . But right now they are a collection of misfits

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

Why is it ok to be racist towards white people[/quote]

It isn’t. That’s a shitty story about your grandma, those people were fucktards.[/quote]

Again, I am not trying to sound repetitive here…but a micro portion of the Tea party is racist…so the whole group gets the label.

A part of the Democratic party voting block (some minorities) are just as racist…yet the whole party gets a free pass…why? [/quote]

The word micro is where we disagree.[/quote]

The Tea Party IS a micro party…so if you have 1,000,000 members and 1000 are racist…that is a micro not a macro situation nationwide.

You have 100,000,000 minorities… if the same percentages hold (and I imagine they are close) that is a LOT of Democratic supporting racists.[/quote]

No. Proportions tell us more about political and social groups than do absolute values. If you were to lay out the proportions of overtly racist constituents I believe that the Tea Party would beat most major political movements in America today.

If the Republican party is made up of 100 million people and two are murderers, I wouldn’t say it’s a party of murderers. If I start a club with one other guy and we are both murderers, it’s a different story isn’t it? Even though the absolute numbers are identical.[/quote]

OK again, fair enough…you think that a large group of (mostly not all white) people that believe in extreme fiscal responsibility and a return to traditional values has a large racist component. Because of a few videos and reports from (I’m sure highly conservative lol) media.

I have just as many videos and articles of minorities acting in a racist manner, but Dems never get the label…thats my point. [/quote]

I have repeatedly said that the fiscal conservatives in the movement don’t deserve criticism. The racist elements do, and by many accounts they are substantial.

yes, these accounts come from the media–but I’m talking about respectable media. The article I quoted earlier was from the Wash. Post. I get my news from the major sources: the BBC, the New York Times, the WSJ, the CSM, etc. In their editorial pages all of these have a decidedly ideological slant, but in the reporting of news they are nowhere near as biased as people like to depict them. Facts are facts. When the New York Times gets something wrong, which they inevitably will, they make the correction. However, take a look at the corrections page…“we misstated the number of brazieres Ms. Hilton buys in a given week”, etc. These are not major ideological problems. News is news and in reputable sources of it in America are about as trustworthy as we can expect.[/quote]

Would you categorize the racist elements of the Democratic Party (La Raza, Mecha, LULAC, MALDEF, Black Panther Party, etc) equally as those you deem to be racist in the Tea Party?

No pitbull its not a collection of misfits, like I stated it is an Organic movement with no true leadership at the top. We have an agenda to restore this country from going into a socialist state as is currently heading into.

It will organize and when you say that the republicans and dems will destroy you are wrong the opposite will happen. The center and the right will overcome both. See what you fail to realize is that most Americans agree with our principles. The wishy washy left are being bought at the moment, when the money runs out…then they will see what wrong they have committed.

Also your passive-aggressive statements dont pass by me, just state what you want too. Quit tip-toeing and act like a Man.

Also I hate LULAC and La Raza, I donated my time to them for a year and saw how fucking corrupt they are here in Dallas. Its such a disgrace the throw 1k scholarship but they pocket the rest of the gov. grants through landscaping or other pet projects to friends.

Once the money of the left is dry and they are exposed which is unfolding slowly but surely, things will change.

[quote]jre67t wrote:
No pitbull its not a collection of misfits, like I stated it is an Organic movement with no true leadership at the top. We have an agenda to restore this country from going into a socialist state as is currently heading into.

It will organize and when you say that the republicans and dems will destroy you are wrong the opposite will happen. The center and the right will overcome both. See what you fail to realize is that most Americans agree with our principles. The wishy washy left are being bought at the moment, when the money runs out…then they will see what wrong they have committed.

Also your passive-aggressive statements dont pass by me, just state what you want too. Quit tip-toeing and act like a Man.

Also I hate LULAC and La Raza, I donated my time to them for a year and saw how fucking corrupt they are here in Dallas. Its such a disgrace the throw 1k scholarship but they pocket the rest of the gov. grants through landscaping or other pet projects to friends.

Once the money of the left is dry and they are exposed which is unfolding slowly but surely, things will change. [/quote]

You know , I hope you are right. Right now they have some healthy opponents ,and we have a large percentage of Americans that are incapable of original thought.Most of the people are just like the ones on this board , It is OK to kill thousands of people , but if you kill a Zygote then you are the lowest of lows.

One of the attractive points to the tea party , which is fiscal conservative absent the social trappings of the MORAL MAJORITY. I believe I was wrong. ABORTION ABORTION ABORTION. Sounds like the Republican party on steroids . Did not touch the military, did not touch the war on drugs . If they are going to be different I wish they would act it