I can't speak for others' reasons.
But if you might have any interest in guesswork:
On the fish oil article, it is only yesterday since your comments.
On the bodyfat article, your point was that Starnes named a number (12%) and you were demanding to know why he didn't pick for example 11% and really seeming to have a tone to what you were saying. And he did make clear in the article that different people differ, and for that matter he even said "about 12%."
So personally I would have interpreted your question as coming from the same place that this thread seems to be coming from, rather than coming from a standpoint of genuine discussion. But, that is a personal take only. No one can be a mind reader and I am not saying that must have been your intent.
Depending on my mood at the moment, I probably would have let that one pass had it been me. It struck me as having no intent but to argue and as having no actual content.
I would never have mentioned this simply from seeing it, but you did start a thread asking why you hadn't gotten replies. These are my thoughts on that, whether accurate or not (possibly not.)