Behind the juvenile music and Batman clips and the bloviating faux-grandiosity of the rhetoric, I think they have a real point here. To threaten somebody who disseminated a bunch of MIT articles with 35 years satisfies the requirements for “cruel and unusual” for me.
Behind the juvenile music and Batman clips and the bloviating faux-grandiosity of the rhetoric, I think they have a real point here. To threaten somebody who disseminated a bunch of MIT articles with 35 years satisfies the requirements for “cruel and unusual” for me.[/quote]
In a country where the majority of the population is brainwashed by Hollywood I think they need all the help they can get hence I can excuse the “music, super-hero that stands for Justice in the Hollywood influenced American mind and the way they use their free speech to achieve full effect.”
Behind the juvenile music and Batman clips and the bloviating faux-grandiosity of the rhetoric, I think they have a real point here. To threaten somebody who disseminated a bunch of MIT articles with 35 years satisfies the requirements for “cruel and unusual” for me.[/quote]
In a country where the majority of the population is brainwashed by Hollywood I think they need all the help they can get hence I can excuse the “music, super-hero that stands for Justice in the Hollywood influenced American mind and the way they use their free speech to achieve full effect.”
Otherwise I agree with you completely.
[/quote]
Yeah, it’s certainly not a major offense–just a little cheesy. Anyway, if it’s all true–I haven’t looked into any of this further than a couple news stories–then I’ve got to say, the 35 years business is beyond draconian.