There isn't an argument. The conventional broism that oral only is shit, just simply is not true. It's about perspective. The point was not that it was inferior...the point is it does work, and work well for those who have their expectations in the right place, which does not equate with inferior in that context. Quantity of gains may not be the same, but you can still make high quality gains. People made good gains on the original MAG-10...basically a legal steroid....so if you can't on some winny/drol then you're not doing something right. It's not always about the drugs.
I should add that I'm not implying anyone here lacks the know how to make gains....it's just that you so frequently hear something to the effect of "i took 50 mg dbol as day for 3 weeks and lost everything after" which reflects poorly on the individual, not the choice of cycle. There is a long time vet on here, who'll remain nameless, whom shared his experiences with me using just dbol and adex. He did a few weeks of dbol in the 30-40 mg range with adex, had bloodwork done during his use and post cycle and made gains he was happy with, with minimal suppression and an easy recovery. Again, its all about your perspective. Long cycles are great, but have potential drawbacks including diminished returns at some point of longer durations, and issues with recovery. Short cycles are great too, but obviously the quantity of gains made will be less, and you get the feeling that you are coming off right when you feel you are making the most progress. It's all a trade off based on what you measure as success over the long term.