[quote]dez6485 wrote:
im happy for you that youve got enough free time in your day to read that whole fucking thing. try doing something else with your time you arrogant, cocksmokin jackfuck.
its fucking stupid that people that know the answers to peoples questions cant simply just answer the fucking question because of the fact that one of the other 700,000 registered T-Nation users has asked the question sometime in the past 6-8 years. i suppose if youre walking down the street and pass someone with a flat tire, and they asked you how to change it, youd tell them to “read the fucking manual on how to change tires” huh? because clearly the question had been asked before, by someone, somewhere, and clearly the answer to their question had been compiled some time, by someone. therefore, jesus christ, how arrogant they must be to ask You, GOD almighty, for your help on how to change their tire.
i am arrogant because i asked for help? then i get this as a response: a) someone that doesnt know the answer, and therefore shouldnt have responded to the question, or b) knows the answer, but would rather say “go read it for yourself” than just give me a simple answer- which makes them a dick. but somehow in that i became arrogant? hmmm. perhaps you need a dictionary so you can stop using words of which you dont know the meaning you arrogant, cocksmokin jackfuck. [/quote]
You’re easily agitated. That was a good response, but truthfully your questions on the diet do make it sound like you didn’t do much research on it. Posting a question on here you should make the assumption people will tell you to go read an already established thread on the specific diet you are questioning. It would have been good for your original post to be less wordy and actually have mentioned that you “looked through” the large thread and you are still confused.
[quote]dez6485 wrote:
i would certainly be interested in reading a T-Nation article about it. i searched for “anabolic diet” last night and it looked like everything it came up with just mentioned the diet in the article, but wasnt actually the article itself. perhaps it is called something else? i also remember reading someones post somewhere saying that the anabolic diet article was several years old and that its now called like T-Dawg 2.0 but its a little different. anyone know what im talking about?[/quote]
In a manner of 30 seconds I found the following links…
http://www.T-Nation.com/findArticle.do?article=body_69eat
http://www.T-Nation.com/findArticle.do?article=body_71eat
Have you read these? And yes supposedly the T-Dawg 2.0 is a better version- but I’ve done T-Dawg and it didn’t seem anything like what the AD should have been.
I do want to say that the AD is an old method. I would consider something a little more current if I were you.