[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
AC. I gotta agree with the women on this one. Some women, possibly even most (more than half) are completely untouchable if they are happily in a relationship. This is coming from a man, like you, with a way over-blown ego…
[/quote]
I don’t intend to pinch hit for AC but I think you’re missing the point.
Keywords:
[i]women
if
are happily[/i]
We have a noun and a verb modified with an adverb and they are entirely contingent on a preposition, the preposition of course being “if.”
The point is, generally speaking, women are creatures principally driven by emotions (that is not some kind of negative indictment, for the record). The sway of those emotions can cause a typical woman to drift in and out of “happiness.” Also, many women tend to place the burden of providing their happiness on others, not themselves, and many times those others are, of course, their significant others.
So I agree with your premise, Monsieur OnEdge, in that women in a happy relationship can be pretty much “untouchable” but women can easily make themselves “touchable” by gentle or not so gentle nudges in their happiness vagaries.
I also, therefore, must agree with AC as well. He remains dead-on in his point. If he caught Em, for example, or any other woman (alright, maybe not ANY other woman but many) in the right spot somewhere in the intrinsic ebb and flow of their happiness tide they are going to cave. It’s borderline inevitable (generally speaking) if the timing’s right.
So we end up with:
Happy relationship = solid resistance to straying
“I strayed” = “Whoops! Sorry but I was ‘unhappy’ at the moment” rationalization “and besides, you were the one not making me happy so it’s really your fault too!”
[/quote]
Feel free to pinch hit anytime, sir - well said.