[quote]pittbulll wrote:
A traitor is some one that does not agree with me , sounds like the group here that berates any one that disagrees with the majority, Your liberals are the ones that are traitors in your eyes.
No one has the right to take your property with out uour consent . I am sure that is a reference to taxes . That is covered with NO TAXATION WITH OUT REPRESENTATION.You have representation…
What big government ? did they realize was not for them ? this was 230 years ago , no big government exsisted
I agree our government oversteps their bondries . but that is not what I hear people pissing and moaning about , I hear them pissing and moaning about what the perceived majority want .
I agree our government is some what tyanical , but why weren’t you pissing and moaning about in the Bush era ?
Rush, Beck ,and the rest is where they really lose me , I have heard some points I really like about the tea party , but these fucking idiots are the ones that label anyone that disagrees with them as trators
I am tired of typing. I wish they would put spell check in[/quote]
Yes Pitt… where were we? Tha camel had not broke the straws back…ummm flip that.
Bush did suck, but we had to play the game and defend our side.
Today we see where this goes as far as any fiscal responsibility compared to the past. Yes we have had bad policies a republicans, but this Obama year was exponentially greater in fiscal irresponsibilty and growth of government into our lives and pocketbook. New Cap Tax, HC, VAT AMNESTY, entitlements etc…
War, Patriot Act. Yes. These were tough issues and pills to swallow. Bush was a fiscal socialist his last 2 years playing along with dems in the majority.
The Tea Party is not happy with Republicans, nor Democrats.
The irresponsible fiscal path we are on now is X10 of what we have dealt with in modern times. Too much liberty robbing, reckless spending. This Tea Party was going to happen either way the 2008 election went.
I’m kinda drunk…