[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:
[quote]Marzouk wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:
Eating 8,000 calories is expensive, time-consuming, & unhealthy.[/quote]
Could you go into detail about how “8,000” calories in itself is “unhealthy”?[/quote]
Eating 8000 claories has gota be hard so people tend to turn to so called bad foods… 8000 cals from deep fried shrimp and egg noodles has gota being damage somewhere![/quote]
Well that–nobody’s eating a clean 8,000 calories day in day out–and it is just an extension of the widely accepted theory of caloric restriction & longevity.
Details, no I cannot provide them for the subject matter is over my head and is not fully understood by top scientists. Still, caloric restriction without malnutrition has been shown to extend both median and maximum lifespan in a wide range of animals, and preliminary findings in humans have been positive.
Yes, I am making an assumption when I say that if low calories are healthy, than extremely high calories are unhealthy…however I do not think that this is an unreasonable assumption. This is likely where you will disagree with me. That’s fine, just explaining my position.
I predict that you will say “nobody with 20” arms eats low calories". True, but most IFBB pros eat about 4-5000 calories daily, a far cry from the 8,000 eaten here. So if these monsters don’t need that much food, why would a 180 pound individual need that much?[/quote]
How do you know what that guy’s caloric requirements are? Hmm. Let me think on this one. Oh, I don’t know, maybe his metabolim is shit-fucking hot? By your wisdom, if I stuck to the “widely accepted theory of caloric restriction & longevity” I’d be a skinny fuck for the rest of my life. It’s ****s like you that’ll discourage the skinny kids opening up this thread from eating as much as they can in order to pack on mass. What did Waylander and Professor X have in common in the early stages of their lifting? Oh yeah, they FUCKING ATE.