Wait, so you’re suggesting a guy could start at 135lbs and become 300lbs while staying at 20% bf naturally? You realize that at that size he’d be bigger than someone like Jay Cutler right?[/quote]
I’m not suggesting anything. I’m asking, why aren’t these scenarios possible. That’s the most outlandish one. I have no idea if that would make him larger than Cutler or not. [/quote]
yes you are suggesting these things you moron.
who in the fuck is 135lbs and 20% bf???
how tall is this person???
no they could not go from 135lbs 20% bf to 210lbs at 10%. your other examples are equally ignorant.
i REALLY dont want to get involved in a back and forth with you again, but 1. you are just such an idiot 2. you wont stop stalking my posts so it makes it difficult :([/quote]
You’ve gotta be one of the biggest cunts on the planet.
I wasn’t suggesting anything. I used this thing called a question mark. A question mark annotates a question.
Plenty of people are 135 @ 20%. None of the options are ignorant you’re just a closed minded little shit. No one is stalking your posts. I’ve direct posts at you in three threads. Get over yourself. [/quote]
no one is going from 135 @20% to 210 @10%
this is as bad as your comments on ronda rousey
the fact that in your complete ignorance and idiocy you are so rude and aggressive just makes me shake my head
keep thinking you have a clue buddy
You don’t even know the definition of lean mass according to the authors who gave you the idea of an arbitrary limit in the first place.
What’s best is the fact that you perceive yourself being in a position to qualify the muscular gains of someone with a 700lb deadlift in his early twenties as if you’re both on the same genetic level.
I really don’t care for how true these limits are but the arrogance of some of you fuckers is seriously astounding.[/quote]
I’ve been posting on here for 7+ years and no one has come across as a bigger asshat than this guy with the exception of you know who. [/quote]
- unless cparker is a genetic marvel the likes of which humanity has never before seen he has not gone from 200 to 275 as a natural with those 75 being “lean gains” neither is he now “decently lean” at 275 as a natural (by any reasonable definition).
honestly, again, how can this even be argued???
- no one is going from a starting point of adult male of average height as a natural starting from 135 at 20% bf to 210 at 10%.
people disagreeing with points 1 or 2 are either trolling or genuinely ignorant as to what these numbers mean in real life as opposed to some ridiculous theoretical online bs argument.
i train with a guy 5’10 210 10% who is a fucking tank and immensely strong (520 bench, 650 squat, 680 dead).
he has exceptional genetics for muscle. do you think such a person is REALLY (in the real world not in some ridiculous online scenario) going to be 135 at 20% bf prior to training as an adult??? no he’s naturally going to be quite built and pretty lean before even starting any training at all.
an actual 210 10% physique is fucking immense! jesus you are acting like it is no big deal at all.
seriously, rather than argue for the sake of it, think through what you are saying first.
You just don’t get it, you dumb cunt.
It’s not about whether some questionable limit can or cannot be broken. It’s the fact that people like you can display such sheer arrogance by seeking to relegate the extent of human potential to a single formula.
This is how losers think. Losers who can’t stand the idea of someone exceling beyond a level they cannot possibly fathom.